The impact of corporate venture funds at the results of parent companies’ innovation activities

The purpose of the paper is to test empirically the relationship between the different features of corporate venture funds and the innovation performance of companies that create corporate venture funds. Though corporate venture funds are considered as important components of corporate innovation strategies, and each fourth largest innovative company is investing via them, the scholars have different vision on their role in innovation-based development of parent companies. Usually case studies or surveys are used to describe their importance. This paper contains an attempt to close the gap on the empirical base and to reveal factors that may have the highest important for the effective organization of innovation activities with the usage of corporate venture investments. The research is performed by regression analysis. The sample consists of 117 largest corporate venture funds, and the data is collected for the period of 2011-2015. The results obtained may have an interesting application for the corporate venture investments organization in Russia, where this mode of innovation-based investments becomes more popular in the recent years

Keywords: corporate venture funds; innovation activities; innovation-based performance


1. Kosteev V., Nikitchenko A., Pikuleva E., Bobkova N. Korporativnye venchurnye investitsii v Rossii: sostoyanie i perspektivy (2014-2015 gg) [Corporate venture investments in Russia: modern state and perspectives]. – Moscow, Club of directors on research and innovation, 2014. Available at: (accessed: 20.05.2016 г.). (In Russian)

2. Matsnev O. Venture Entrepreneurship: International Experience and the Russian Case. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2006, no. 5. P.122-131. (In Russian).

3. Rogova E.M., Tkachenko E.A., Fyaksel E.A. Фияксель Э.А. Venchurnyy menedzhment [Venture management]. Moscow, Izdatel'skiy dom VShE [HSE Publishing], 2011. (In Russian)

4. Smelik O. A. Venture investments in Russian innovations: modern state and development perspectives, Innovatsionnaya deyatel'nost' [Innovation activity], 2013, no. 3. P. 141-147. (In Russian)

5. Cherkasova V.A., Teplova O.Yu. Research of impact of financial constraints on investment decisions of companies in emerging capital markets, Korporativnye finansy [Journal of Corporate Finance Research], 2013, no. 2(26). P. 4-17.

6. Chesbrough, H.W. (2002). Making sense of corporate venture capital //Harvard Business Review, no. 80 (3). P. 90-99.

7. Filatotchev, I., Wright, M., Buck, T., Zhukov, V. (1999). Corporate entrepreneurs and privatized firms in Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus //Journal of Business Venturing, no. 14 (5-6). P. 475-492.

8. Jaruzelski, B., Schwartz, K., Staack, V. (2015). The Global Innovation 1000: Innovation’s New World Order //strategy+business, no. 81, Winter.

9. Kaplan, S., Zingales, L. (1997). Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? // Quarterly Journal of Economics, no. 112 (1). P. 169-215.

10. Kuratko, D. (2009). The entrepreneurial imperative of the 21st century //Business Horizons, no. 52. P. 421-428.

11. Mason, H., Rohner, T. (2002). The venture imperative: a new model for corporate innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.

12. Maula, M. V. (2001). Corporate venture capital and the value-added for technology-based firms. Doctoral dissertation. Institute of Strategy and International Business, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki.

13. Narayanan, V.K., Yang, Yi., Zahra, Sh.A. (1999). Corporate venturing and value creation: A review and proposed framework //Research Policy, no. 39. P. 58-76.

14. Yang, Y., Narayanan, V.K., Zahra, S.A. (2009). Developing the selection and valuation capabilities through learning: The case of corporate venture capital // Journal of Business Venturing, no. 24 (3). P. 261-273.