Diagnostics of the conditions of energy sector innovation ecosystem development
Possibilities of identification and creation of the conditions, providing energy sector innovation ecosystem development are analyzed in the article. Ecosystem evolution (including energy sector ecosystems) as a form of network cooperation is ensured by specific conditions — particular type of participants, level of sector institutional development, possibilities of technological platforms (special tool for innovation infrastructure development) functions implementation, presence of developed market and demand for innovation products. During the interview, held with the energy sector representatives, and monitoring of open sources as well, availability and the problems of the conditions elaboration, which assure innovation ecosystem development, were determined. As a result, the revealed level of ecosystem development conditions was not sufficient for the cooperation. Worked out recommendations based on the results obtained were directed towards improvement of the existing level of innovation ecosystem development conditions and to the exploration of innovation ecosystem place in Russian energy sector development initiative — Energynet
Keywords: technological platform, ecosystem, innovation ecosystem, innovation, energy sector, energy production
References
1. Аналитический отчет «О взаимодействии элементов инновационной инфраструктуры». http://ac.gov.ru/files/attachment/4845.pdf.
2. Р. Баджо, М. Ю. Шерешева. Сетевой подход в экономике и управлении: междисциплинарный характер//Вестник Московского университета. Серия 6: «Экономика». № 2. М.: изд-во Моск. ун-та, 2014. С. 3-21.
3. И. О. Волкова, Е. Д. Бурда. Анализ состояния и перспектив развития технологических платформ в российской энергетике//Инновации. № 5. 2017. С. 25-33.
4. А. А. Дагаев, А. Ю. Яковлева. Экосистема инноваций (региональные особенности формирования и развития)//Федерализм. 2011. № 4 (64). С. 55-64.
5. Концепция проекта реализации технологической платформы «Интеллектуальная энергетическая система России». М.: ФСК ЕЭС, 2010.
6. О дорожной карте «Энерджинет». http://www.nts-ees.ru/sites/default/files/prezentaciya_energynet_20160707_nts_ees.pdf.
7. Отчет о выполнении проекта реализации технологической платформы «Интеллектуальная энергетическая система
России» (ТП ИЭС) в 2013 г. и план действий ТП ИЭС на 2014 г. http://rosenergo.gov.ru/regulations_and_methodologies/tehnologicheskaya_platforma_tp_ies.
8. Заключение по итогам оценки деятельности Технологических платформ в 2016 г. http://innovation.gov.ru/ru/tp.
9. Перечень технологических платформ (утвержден решениями Правительственной комиссии по высоким технологиям и инновациям от 1 апреля 2011 г., протокол № 2, от 5 июля 2011 г., протокол № 3, решением президиума Правительственной комиссии по высоким технологиям и инновациям от 21 февраля 2012 г., протокол № 2). http://economy.gov.ru/wps/wcm/connect/de672f004ac039db8aeb8baf3367c32c/perechen_tp.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=de672f004ac039db8aeb8baf3367c32c.
10. О. Третьяк, М. Румянцева. Сетевые формы межфирменной кооперации: подходы к объяснению феномена//Российский журнал менеджмента. 2003. № 1. C. 77-102.
11. М. Ю. Шерешева. Формы сетевого взаимодействия. Курс лекций: учеб. пособие. М.: Изд. дом. гос. ун-та – Высшей школы экономики, 2010.
12. Энерджинет. Национальная технологическая инициатива. Новые возможности энергетики будущего. http://energynet.ru/data/EnergoNET2.pdf.
13. А. Ю. Яковлева. Силиконовая долина в России: насколько это реально?//Инновационный менеджмент. 2010. № 3 (11). C. 186-201.
14. R. Adner (2012). The wide lens: A new strategy for innovation. Penguin UK.
15. Assessing Smart Grid Benefits and Impacts: EU and U.S. Initiatives, Joint Report EC JRC – US DOE, 2012, European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC) Institute for Energy and Transport (IET). https://www.netl.doe.gov/File%20Library/research/energy%20efficiency/smart%20grid/reports/EU-US-Smart-Gridassessment---final-report--online-version.pdf.
16. A. Bramwell, N. Hepburn, D. Wolfe (2012). Growing Innovation Ecosystems: University-Industry Knowledge Transfer and Regional Economic Development in Canada. University of Toronto. Final Report.
17. H. Chesbrough (2003). The Era of Open Innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review. P. 35-41.
18. H. Etzkowitz, L. Leydesdorff (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: from National Systems and «Mode 2» to a Triple Helix of
University – Industry – Government Relations//Research Policy, 29 (2).
19. European Research Advisory Board Report on European Technology Platforms. (2004). EURAB 04.010-final. http://ec.europa.eu/research/eurab/pdf/recommendations9.pdf.
20. M. Iansiti, R. Levien (2004). The keystone advantage: what the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Harvard Business Press.
21. C. H. Fine (2005). Are you modular or integral? Be sure your supply chain knows//Strategy+Business, 39(2), 1-8.
22. R. Isaak (2009). From collective learning to Silicon Valley replication: The limits to synergistic entrepreneurship in Sophia Antipolis//Research in International Business and Finance, 23 (2), 134-143.
23. Launching the «NANOfutures» European Initiative. The European Technology Integration and Innovation Platform (ETIP) in Nanotechnology. (2010). Nanofutures. http://ec.europa.eu/investin-research/pdf/workshop/kruger_h1.pdf.
24. F. Malerba, Ed. (2004). Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Concepts, Issues and Analysis of six Major Sectors in Europe. Cambridge University press, UK, 2004.
25. B. Mercan, D. Goktas (2011). Components of Innovation Ecosystems: A Cross- Country Study//International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 76.
26. J. F. Moore. The death of competition: leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. Harper Business, New York, 1997.
27. R. R. Nelson, S. G. Winter (2009). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press.
28. H. Overholm (2015). Collectively created opportunities in emerging ecosystems: the case of solar service ventures//Technovation, 39, 14-25.
29. M. Peltoniemi (2004, September). Cluster, value network and business ecosystem: Knowledge and innovation approach. In Organisations, Innovation and Complexity: New Perspectives on the Knowledge Economy. Conference, September (p. 9-10).
30. M. Peltoniemi, E. Vuori (2004, September). Business ecosystem as the new approach to complex adaptive business environments. In Proceedings of eBusiness research forum (Vol. 18, p. 267-281).
31. L. Propris, C. Corradini (2013). Technology Platforms in Europe: an empirical investigation. Working paper 34. WWWforEurope Project. Work Package 306. MS67 «Research paper on the development and anchoring of new technological platforms».
32. A. Pyka, A. Scharnhorst (Eds.). (2010). Innovation networks: new approaches in modelling and analyzing. Springer Science & Business Media.
33. G. Rampersad, P. Quester, I. Troshani (2010). Managing innovation networks: Exploratory evidence from ICT, biotechnology and nanotechnology networks//Industrial Marketing Management, 39 (5), 793-805.
34. L. Ricard (2016). Aligning innovation with grand societal challenges: Inside the European Technology Platforms in wind, and carbon capture and storage//Science and Public Policy, 43 (2). P. 169-183.
35. M. Rothschild (1990). Bionomics: Economy as ecosystem. Beard Books.
36. R. W. Rycroft, D. E. Kash (2004). Self-organizing innovation networks: implications for globalization//Technovation, 24 (3), 187-197.
37. H. B. Weil, V. P. Sabhlok, C. L. Cooney (2014). The dynamics of innovation ecosystems: A case study of the US biofuel market// Energy strategy reviews, 3, 88-99.
38. P. Weise (1996). Evolution and Self-Organization. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift fьrdie gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 152 (4), 716-722.
39. P. Witte, B. Slack, M. Keesman, J. H. Jugie, B. Wiegmans (2017). Facilitating start-ups in port-city innovation ecosystems: A case study of Montreal and Rotterdam. Journal of Transport Geography.
40. K. Valkokari, P. Valkokari (2014). How SMEs Can Manage Their Networks–Lessons Learnt from Communication in Animal Swarm//Journal of Inspiration Economy, 1 (1), 111-128.
41. K. Valkokari (2015). Business, innovation, and knowledge ecosystems: How they differ and how to survive and thrive within them//Technology Innovation Management Review, 5 (8).
42. K. Valkokari, M. Seppдnen, M. Mдntylд, S. Jylhд-Ollila (2017). Orchestrating Innovation Ecosystems: A Qualitative Analysis of Ecosystem Positioning Strategies//Technology Innovation Management Review, 7 (3).
43. I. Visnjic, A. Neely, C. Cennamo, N. Visnjic (2016). Governing the City: Unleashing Value from the Business Ecosystem//California Management Review, 59 (1), 109-140.
44. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_ecosystem.
45. Перспективные технологии возобновляемой энергии (ПТВЭ). http://www.i-renew.ru.
46. Малая распределенная энергетика» (МРЭ). http://www.e-apbe.ru/distributed_energy.
47. Экологически чистая тепловая энергетика высокой эффективности. http://tp-rusenergy.ru
48. Проект № 5 программы фундаментальных исследований Национального исследовательского университета «Высшая школа экономики» (НИУ-ВШЭ) за 2017 г. «Некоторые вопросы развития розничных рынков электроэнергии, а также экономики городов и агломераций».
