Conceptual foundations of the study of megascience as an organizational and management Innovation

The article outlines the conceptual foundation for the study of the practice of creating large-scale cospecialized megaclass research facilities for collective use. Proceeding from the thesis that mega-science differs from the previous organization not quantitatively but qualitatively, it is analyzed as a key organizational and management innovation that can change the paradigm of organizaing the scientific research, directly and indirectly exerting a significant influence on international cooperation, institutional and spatial organization of the national science, its interaction with the industry and education, and, under certain conditions, interdisciplinary research. Megascience is considered as a unique form of network organization with the centralization of highly specialized material and material resources in the decentralization of intellectual resources. The article suggests approaches to the study of such an organization using the analysis of cooperative networks and cognitive mapping

Keywords: organizational and managerial innovations, megascience, megafacilities, cognitive mapping, cooperative networks


  1. Ahuja G. Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2000, no 3, pp. 425–455.
  2. Bergman J.-P., Knutas A., Jantunen A., Tarkiainen A., Luukka P. Karlik A., Platonov V. Strategic Interpretation on Sustainability Issues: Eliciting Cognitive Maps of Boards of Directors. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 2016, no 1, pp. 162–186.
  3. Forester J.W. Counter intuitive Behavior of Social Systems. Technology Review, 1971, no.3, pp. 52–68.
  4. Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 1973, no. 6, pp. 1360–1380.
  5. Grossman G. Innovation and Information in the Soviet Economy. The American Economic Review, 1966, no. 1/2, pp. 118-130.
  6. Helfat C.E., Finkelstein S., Mitchell W. Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations, Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA, 2007, 147 p.
  7. Kornai J. Resource-constrained Versus Demand-constrained Systems. Econometrica, 1979, no. 4, pp. 801–819.
  8. Lami S. Challenges and New Requirements for International Collaborations. Science & Diplomacy, 2017 no. 2. Available at: (accessed 03.07.2017).
  9. Hoddeson L., Kolb A.W., Westfall C. Fermilab: Physics, the Frontier and Megascience. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2008. 497 p.
  10. Nooteboom B., Van Haverbeke W., Duysters G., Gilsing V. & Van den Oord A. Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 2007, no 7, pp. 1016–1034.
  11. Powell W. W. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in organizational behavior, 1990. no. 1, pp. 295-336
  12. Stine D.D. The Manhattan Project, the Apollo Program, and Federal Energy Technology R&D Programs: A Comparative Analysis. CRS Report for Congress. Available at: (accessed 31.07.2017).
  13. A meeting on mega-science was held at the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation. press releases. 2011-06-24 (accessed 7/08/2017).
  14. Abramova NA, Avdeeva Z.K. Cognitive analysis and management of development of situations: problems of methodology, the theory and practice. Problems of management, 2008, № 3, pp. 85-87
  15. Drucker P. Management Challenges for the 21st Centur. - M .: Williams, 2007. 286 p.
  16. Eliseeva I.I., Platonov V.V, Bergman J.-P., Dyukov I., Ryuyotta P. Formation of the dominant logic of the company's development: peering into the black box. Economic Science of Modern Russia, 2016, No. 4, pp. 30-42.
  17. Karlik A.E., Platonov V.V. Interindustry territorial innovation networks. Economy of the region, 2016, №4, pp. 1218-1232.
  18. Karlik A.E., Platonov V.V. Organizational and managerial innovations: reserve of boosting the competitiveness of the Russian industry / / Economic revival of Russia, 2015, No. 4, pp. 34-44.19.
  19. Castells M. Information Age: Economics, Society and Culture / Trans. With the English. Under the scientific. Ed. O.I. Shkaratan. - Moscow: State University Higher School of Economics, 2000. 608 p.
  20. Kleiner G.B. The System Paradigm and System Management. The Russian Journal of Management, 2008, No. 3, pp. 27-50.
  21. Platonov V. V. "The Solow Paradox" twenty years later, or a study of the impact of innovation in information technology on productivity growth, Finance and Business, 2007, No. 3, pp. 28-39.22.
  22. Platonov V.V, Bergman Yu.P., Khultin T. Impact of cross-border cooperative networks on the dynamics of innovation activity in border regions. Finances and Business, 2010, No. 1, pp. 47-64.
  23. Platonov V.V., Statovskaya D.A., Statovskiy D.Yu. Localization of innovation processes: beyond the concept of geographical proximity. Innovations. 2015, No. 7, pp.76-79.
  24. Pronskih VS Epistemic dissociation of experimentation in megascience and approaches to its overcoming, Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, 2015, №1, pp.207-222
  25. Radaev V. Sociology of markets: to the formation of a new direction. - Moscow: State University Higher School of Economics, 2003. 328 p.
  26. Soldatov AV Mega-Science Equipment as the most important tool for integrating science and education of world level / / Higher Education in Russia, 2015, № 8-9, pp.94-98.