Increase of management efficiency innovation potential in the globalized economy

The purpose of this study was to develop a methodology for assessing and justifying the tools needed to improve the efficiency of the management of innovation potential in the context of economic globalization on the example of a high-tech enterprise. The studies developed a method of estimation of innovative potential of high-tech enterprise, which differs from the comprehensive approach to the analysis proposed by foreign and Russian scientists, which allows to take into account one aspect of globalization of the economy, and to ensure greater confidence in the conditions of application of expert methods. Proposed methodological approach is based on the methodology of fuzzy set theory, matrix methods of aggregation and analysis of complex systems. The advantage of the proposed in the methodological toolkit is the ability to a coordinated use of indicators which are measured in different difficult comparative values, as well as the transparency of this evaluation. Information obtained through the procedure contains a qualitative and quantitative assessment of each element of the structure of innovative capacity, which is an effective supplement to the management of the organization and allows the supervisor to take justified and high-quality solutions to improve the innovative capacity. The proposed tool, in our opinion, is essential to assess the innovation potential in the analysis of this type in the conditions of uncertainty and incomplete information. Results of the study are universal and can be used for improving the management of all economic systems

Keywords: innovation potential; systems approach; assessment methodology; management effectiveness; fuzzy sets theory

References

  1. Belyaeva, E.S. Sovershenstvovanie upravleniya innovatsionnoy deyatelnostyu promyishlennogo predpriyatiya na osnove otsenki innovatsionnogo potentsiala. Diss. Phd [Improving the management of innovative activity of industrial enterprise on the basis of assessment of the innovative capacity of]. Barnaul, 2011.
  2. European Commission. Innovation Management and Knowledge – Driven Economy. Brussels – Luxembourg. European Commission. 2004. Available at:  http://www.innovation.lv/ino2/publications/studies_innovation_management_final_report.pdf (Accessed 16.06.2015).
  3. Eurostat. SMEs and entrepreneurship in the EU. 2006. Available at:  http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS‐NP‐06‐024/EN/KS‐NP‐06‐024‐EN.PDF (Accessed 16.06.2015).
  4. Fahrutdinov, R.A.  Innovatsionnyiy menedzhment: uchebnik. SPb: Piter. 2006
  5. Fishbern, P.  Teoriya poleznosti dlya prinyatiya resheniy. M.: Nauka. 1978.
  6. Gamidullayeva, L.A. Modernizatsiya ekonomiki kak imperativ innovatsionnogo razvitiya Rossii / V.I. Chernetsov, L.A. Gamidullayeva. Ekonomika i upravleniye, 2014, no. 1 (99), pp. 45-52
  7. Kaplan, R.S. Sbalansirovannaya sistema pokazateley. Ot strategii k deystviyu. M.: Olimp-Biznes. 2003.
  8. Kokupin, D.I. Innovatsionnaya aktivnost. M.: Ekzamen. 2001. 576 pp.
  9. Komkov, N.I., Balayan, G.G., Bondareva, N.N. Trebovaniya i usloviya otsenki effektivnosti biznes-innovatsiy v usloviyah ryinochnoy konkurentsii. Nauchnyie trudyi INP RAS. M.: Maks-Press. 2005.
  10. Kompleksnaya otsenka innovatsionnogo potentsiala promyishlennogo predpriyatiya: rekomendatsii. Tomsk: TGU. 2004.
  11. Lubbers, R., Koorevaar, I. Primary globalisation, secondary globalisation and the sustainable development paradigm, Opposing forces in the 21st Century. Berlin, Germany: Globus. 1999. Available at: http://www.mgimo.ru/fileserver/2004/kafedry/mirec/konf_2-12-05/primary-secondary_globaliz.pdf (Accessed 18.06.2015).
  12. Nedosekin, A.O. Metodologicheskie osnovyi modelirovaniya finansovoy deyatelnosti s ispolzovaniem nechetko-mnozhestvennyih opisaniy. Dokt. Diss. [Methodological bases of modeling of financial activity using fuzzy-multiple descriptions]. Sankt-Peterburg, 2003.
  13. Nedosekin, A.O. Nechetko-mnozhestvennyiy analiz riska fondovyih investitsiy. 2001. Available at: http:/sedok.narod.ru/index.html (Accessed 20.06.2015).
  14. Nedosekin, A.O. Strategicheskoe planirovanie s ispolzovaniem nechetko-mnozhestvennyih opisaniy. 2007. Available at: http:/sedok.narod.ru/index.html (Accessed 18.06.2015).
  15. Nurgalieva, S.M. Problemyi otsenki innovatsionnogo potentsiala predpriyatiya. Voprosyi sovremennoy nauki i praktiki, 2008, no. 11, pp. 238-243
  16. Pancheva, L.A. Formirovanie effektivnoy sistemyi upravleniya innovatsionnyim potentsialom promyishlennogo predpriyatiya na printsipah investirovaniya i upravleniya proizvodstvom. Diss. Phd. [Shaping of effective system management of innovative potential of industrial enterprises based on principles of investing and production management]. Orel, 2006.
  17. Robertson, R., Lechner, F. Modernization, globalization and the problem of culture in the world-systems theory. Theory, Culture & Society, 1985, no. 2, pp.103‒117.
  18. The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities. OECD, French. 2005. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/19900414 (Accessed 15.06.2015).
  19. Trifilova, A.A. Povyishenie effektivnosti innovatsionnogo potentsiala predpriyatiya. Moskva: Finansyi i statistika. 2005.
  20. United Nations. Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies. United Nations Press, New York, USA. 2001. Available at:   http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/natlinfo/indicators/guidelines.pdf (Accessed 16.06.2015).
  21. World Economic Forum. The Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014. 2014. Available at:  http://www.weforum.org/issues/global-competitiveness. (Accessed 18.06.2015).

 

Authors