Current trends in the construction of scientific consortia

Some of the most notable practices and some current trends in the search, development of organizational and legal forms of association of organizations for the consolidation of resources aimed at obtaining new scientific and technical results are considered. The features of the policy of the leading states in the formation and coordination of the functioning of research consortia, including the European Union in the implementation of the Horizon 2020 framework program and the Horizon Europe program that replaces it, are shown. The foreign experience and the results of research on the problems of cooperation of scientific, educational and industrial organizations on the basis of the institute of consortia, as well as the relatively short Russian experience in using this form of cooperation, are analyzed

Keywords: forms of association of activities, consortia, research and development


  1. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation «On measures to implement state policy in the field of education and science» of May 7, 2012 № 599. (In Russ.)
  2. Report on the results of the expert-analytical event «Analysis of the effectiveness of state support measures for Russian universities aimed at increasing their competitiveness among the world's leading scientific and educational centers». Accounting Chamber of the Russian Federation. (In Russ.)
  3. Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation «On measures for the implementation of the strategic academic leadership program «Priority-2030» of May 13, 2021 № 729. (In Russ.)
  4. Digest: «University consortia. Review of the practices of Russian universities». № 6, April. 2021. 772d5eef437c0f/Uni_practice_06.pdf. (In Russ.)
  5. V. Falkov. Formation of consortia is the basis of the Strategic Academic Leadership Program. (In Russ.)
  6. Report on the results of the expert-analytical event «Identification of the main reasons hindering scientific development in the Russian Federation: assessment of scientific infrastructure, sufficiency of motivational measures, ensuring the attractiveness of the work of leading scientists». Accounting Chamber of the Russian Federation. (In Russ.)
  7. N. G. Kurakova, V. G. Zinov, L. A. Tsvetkova et al. Features of project consortia as a new organizational and managerial form of conquering niches in global high-tech markets. (April 4, 2017). Available at SSRN. (In Russ.)
  8. O. F. Malashkina. Consortium as a model for managing the development of high-tech companies//Economy and society: modern models of development. 2020. Vol. 10. № 1. P. 69-82. (In Russ.)
  9. N. Savitskaya. «Priority-2030» for universities and the state is different. The leadership of regional universities was inspired by the idea of creating consortia. Independent newspaper//[Russian newspaper], 19.05.2021. (In Russ.) .
  10. V. Ovchinnikova. Is the consortium the solution to the problem or its visibility? Presentation. 2021.Овчинникова%20А.В.pptx. (In Russ.)
  11. G. Vladimirova. Organizational forms of integration of companies//Management in Russia and abroad. 1999. № 6. (In Russ.)
  12. E. Yu. Vitol, G. S. Tyulyaev. The relevance of the construction of consortia for Russian law//Bulletin of Civil Law. 2018. Vol. 18. № 1. P. 50-85. (In Russ.)
  13. The federal target program «Research and development in priority areas of development of the scientific and technological complex of Russia for 2014-2020». Approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of May 21, 2013 № 426. (In Russ.)
  14. V. B. Mikhailets, I. V. Radin, I. S. Sotskova et al. Patterns of commercialization of the results of applied research and development funded by the state//Innovations. 2021. № 4 (270). P. 27-38. (In Russ.)
  15. A. Kuznetsov. Development of forms of strategic partnership. Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Economic Sciences. M., 2014. 189 p. (In Russ.)
  16. Official Journal of the European Union. The rules for participation and dissemination in «Horizon 2020 — the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020)» European Commission (20 December 2013).
  18. M. Morrison, M. Mourby, H. Gowans et al. Governance of research consortia: challenges of implementing Responsible Research and Innovation within Europe. Life Sci Soc Policy 16, 13, 2020.
  19. O. Chetverikov. European Research infrastructure consortia: international organizations under European law or legal entities sui generis?//Lex Russica. 2019. № 7 (152). (In Russ.)
  20. ERIC Landscape Members of the European Research Infrastructure Consortium (ERIC).
  21. H.-S. Choi. Science and technology policies for industrialization of developing countries//Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1986, 29 (3), 225-239.
  22. C.-O. Lee. The role of the government and R&D infrastructure for technology development//Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1988, 33 (1), 33-54.
  23. H. Kim, S. J. Bae, J. S. Yang. Government roles in evaluation and arrangement of R&D consortia//Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2014, 88, 202-215.
  24. Feng-Jyh Lin, Shang-He Wu, Maw-Shin Hsu, Chyuan Perng. The determinants of government-sponsored R&D alliances//Journal of Business Research, 2016, 5192-5195.
  25. Xiaotian Yang. Coopetition for innovation in R&D consortia: Moderating roles of size disparity and formal interaction. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. 2020.
  26. Dong Chen, Li Dai, Donghong Li. A Delicate Balance for Innovation: Competition and Collaboration in R&D Consortia//Management and Organization Review 15:1, March 2019, 145-176. doi:10.1017/mor.2018.4.
  27. Dominguez-Blanco, I. Castro-Abancens, G. Cepeda-Carrion. Antecedents of success in a research and development consortium//International Journal of Innovation Management. 2021. 29 p. doi:10.1142/S1363919621500018.
  28. N. Arranz, J. C. Fernandez de Arroyabe. Principles for the design of management control systems in knowledge networks. Experiences involving the European technology networks//Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2002, 69, 703-719.
  29. N. Arranz, J. C. Fernandez de Arroyabe. Joint R&D projects: Experience in the context of European technology policy//Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2006, 73, 860-885.
  30. H. Okamuro. Determinants of successful R&D cooperation in Japanese small businesses: The impact of organizational and contractual characteristics//Research Policy, 2007, 36, 1529-1544.
  31. O. Bizan. The determinants of success of R&D projects: Evidence from American-Israeli research alliances//Research Policy, 2003, 32, 1619-1640.
  32. B. Aschhoff, T. Schmidt. Empirical evidence on the success of R&D co-operation — happy together?//Review of Industrial Organization, 2008, 33, 41-62.
  33. Caloffi, M. Mariani, A. Mattei, F. Mealli. What kinds of R&D consortia enhance SMEs productivity? A hierarchical Bayesian approach for the analysis of a regional innovation policy//Papers in Regional Science. 2019, 99, 25-53.
  34. H. Dyer, C. B. Powell, M. Sakakibara, A. J. Wang. Determinants of success in R & D alliances//Article in Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings. November 2008. doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2007.26508253.
  35. T. Asheim, H. L. Smith, C. Oughton. Regional innovation systems: Theory, empirics and policy//Regional Studies, 2011, 45 (7), 875-891.
  36. P. Cooke, L. Leydesdorff. Regional development in the knowledge-based economy: The construction of advantage//The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2006, 31 (1), 5-15.
  37. U. Cantner, A. Meder, T. Wolf. Success and failure of firms' innovation co-operations: The role of intermediaries and reciprocity//Papers in Regional Science, 2011, 90 (2), 313-329.
  38. Howells. Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation//Research Policy, 2006, 35 (5), 715-728.
  39. X. L. Chen, C. Hesse, R. Riedel, E. Mueller. The Choice of a Collaboration Form - A Special Insight in the Case of R&D Consortia//Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE IEEM, 2016, 1059-1063.
  40. X. L. Chen, A. Mahling, R. Riedel, E. Mueller. Development of a general collaboration model-Basis for the establishment of a collaboration compass//Proceedings of IEEM 2014, Malaysia, 2014. P. 908-912.
  41. E. Todeva, D. Knoke. Strategic alliances and models of collaboration//Management Decision. Vol. 43. 2005. P. 123-148.
  42. B. Eisner, N. Rahman, H. J. Korn. Formation conditions, innovation, and learning in R&D consortia//Management Decision. Vol. 47. № 6. 2009. P. 851-871.
  43. E. Porter, H. Takeuchi, M. Sakakibara. Can Japan Compete? Perseus Publishing, Cambridge, MA, 2000.
  44. J. T. Macher, D. C. Mowery, D. A. Hodges. Reversal of fortune? The recovery of the US semiconductor industry//California Management Review. Vol. 41. 1998. P. 107-136.
  45. Sakakibara. Heterogeneity of firm capabilities and cooperative research and development: an empirical examination of motives//Strategic Management Journal. Vol. 18, Summer Special Issue. 1997. P. 143-164.
  46. F. J. Contractor, P. Lorange. Why should firms cooperate? The strategy and economics basis for cooperative ventures. Cooperative Strategies in International Business, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, 1988. P. 4-30.
  47. W. Glaister, P. J. Buckley. Strategic motives for international alliance formation//Journal of Management Studies. Vol. 33. 1996. P. 301-333.
  48. E. Abrahamson, L. Rosenkopf. Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: a computer simulation//Organization Science. 1997. Vol. 8. P. 289-309.
  49. J. Hagedoorn. Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences//Strategic Management Journal. 1993. Vol. 14. P. 371-385.
  50. J. Hagedoorn. Strategic technology partnering during the 1980s: trends, networks, and corporate patterns in non-core technologies//Research Policy. 1995. Vol. 24. P. 207-231.
  51. B. Gomes-Casseres. The Alliance Revolution: The New Shape of Business Rivalry, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996.
  52. Rosenkopf, A. Metiu, V. George. From the bottom up? Technical committee activity and alliance formation//Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 46. 2001. P. 748-749.
  53. G. Kristian, S. Patrick. Research and Grant Management: The Role of the Project Management Office (PMO) in a European Research Consortium//The Journal of Research Administration, (49) 1, 2020.
  54. Xia, K. Zhao, J. T. Mahoney. Enhancing value via cooperation: firms’ process benefits from participation in a standard consortium//Industrial and Corporate Change. 2012, 21 (3): 699-729.
  55. R. Gulati, F. Wohlgezogen, P. Zhelyazkov.. The two facets of collaboration: cooperation and coordination in strategic alliances//Academy of Management Annals. 2012, 6 (1): 531-583.
  56. F. Fonti, M. Maoret, R. Whitbred. Free riding in multi party alliances: The role of perceived alliance effectiveness and peers’ collaboration in a research consortium//Strategic Management Journal. 2016. doi: 10.1002/smj.
  57. R. S. Mannak, M. T. H. Meeus, J. Raab, A. C. Smit. A temporal perspective on repeated ties across university-industry R&D consortia//Research Policy: A Journal devoted to Research Policy, Research Management and Planning. 2019, 48 (9), [103829].
  58. Sakakibara. Formation of R&D consortia: industry and company effects//Strategic Management Journal. 2002. Vol. 23. P. 1033-1050. doi: 10.1002/smj.272.
  59. Consortia: a fashionable trend for the university environment or a clearly articulated need. LibInform. 14.06.2021. (In Russ.)
  60. More than 100 universities and research centers have created 19 consortia to participate in the Priority 2030 program. 16.07.2021. Portal of Federal State Educational Standards of higher Education. (In Russ.)
  61. G. Kurakova, O. V. Cherchenko. Approaches to definition of key functions and target indicators of regional research and educational centers//The Economics of Science. 2020, № 6 (4). P. 212-224. (In Russ.)
  62. M. A. Kamenskikh. Investigation of the essence and features of world-class scientific and educational centers//EVR. 2020. № 4 (66). (In Russ.)
  63. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 30.04.2019 № 537 «On measures of state support for world-class scientific and educational centers based on the integration of educational institutions of higher education and scientific organizations and their cooperation with organizations operating in the real sector of the economy». (In Russ.)
  64. Rules for granting subsidies from the federal budget for the provision of state support to the centers of the National Technological Initiative on the basis of educational institutions of higher education and scientific organizations. Approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 16.10.2017 № 1251. (In Russ.)
  65. Federal Law №135-FZ of 26.07.2006 «On Protection of Competition». (In Russ.)
  66. Rules for granting grants in the form of subsidies from the federal budget for the implementation of state support for the creation and development of world-class scientific centers. Approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 30.04.2019 №538. (In Russ.)
  67. Rules for granting grants in the Form of subsidies from the Federal Budget for the Implementation of certain activities of the Federal Scientific and Technical Program for the Development of Synchrotron and Neutron Research and Research Infrastructure for 2019-2027. Approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 30.06.2020 № 951. (In Russ.)
  68. Rules for granting grants in the Form of subsidies from the Federal budget to Scientific organizations and Educational Organizations of Higher education for the Implementation of Certain Activities of the Federal Scientific and Technical Program for the Development of Genetic Technologies for 2019-2027. Approved by Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 28.12.2019 № 1930. (In Russ.)
  69. Federal Law № 44-FZ of 05.04.2013 «On the contract system in the Field of procurement of goods, Works and Services for State and Municipal Needs», Federal Law №223-FZ of 18.07.2011 «On Procurement of Goods, Works and Services by Certain Types of Legal Entities». (In Russ.)