Development of methodology for management of interaction of actors in the regional innovation system based on intellectual analysis of big data

Elements of the regional innovation environment are currently disunited. The main obstacle to effective interaction of subjects of innovation in Russia, we believe to be a high level of innovation costs, which are mainly of a transactional nature. Modeling of processes of interaction of the main participants of innovative activity in the regional innovation system is necessary to understand at a qualitative and quantitative level the role of links between elements of the innovation environment, the impact of their interaction on the attractor zones, on the potentials of system order parameters. Increasing the interaction between all stakeholders in the innovation system is a very important mechanism for the development of innovation at various stages of the innovation process, from the emergence of the idea to the commercialization of innovation. This study is focused on obtaining new knowledge in the field of creating a methodology for multi-agent search, collecting and processing data on indicators of innovative development of enterprises, models and methods of intellectual analysis of collected data. The complex of models and methods is based for the first time on the use of a convergent model for processing big data. The article is aimed at solving fundamental scientific problems in terms of the development of methods for predictive modeling and evaluation of the parameters of innovative development of regional enterprises, the synthesis of new methods of processing and intellectual analysis of big data, methods of extracting knowledge and predicting the dynamics of regional innovation development using benchmarking approach

Keywords: interaction management, cyber-social system, multiagent approach, benchmarking, big data, intellectual analysis, region.

References

  1. S. M. Vasin, L. А. Gamidullaeva. Development of Russian innovation system management concept//Innovatsii. 2017. № 5 (223). S. 34-40.
  2. L. A. Gamidullaeva. Institutyi v razvitii innovatsionnyih system//Journal of Economic Regulation. 2016. Т. 7. № 1. S. 93-103.
  3. L. A. Gamidullaeva. O postroenii kontseptsii upravleniya innovatsionnoy sistemoy Rossii//Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii. 2016. № 4 (50). S. 74-84.
  4. A. A. Domrachev, S. N. Evtushenko, V. P. Kupriyanovskiy, D. E. Namiot. Ob innovatsionnyih initsiativah gosudarstv – chlenov EAES v oblasti postroeniya globalnoy tsifrovoy ekonomiki//International Journal of Open Information Technologies. Vol. 4. № 9. 2016.
  5. A. Marshall. Printsipyi politicheskoy ekonomii. T. 1. M.: Progress, 1993. 415 s.
  6. R. Baheti, H. Gill. Cyber-physical systems//The impact of control technology. 2011. Vol. 12. P. 161-166.
  7. B. Bergvall-Kareborn, M. Holst, A. Stahlbrost. Concept design with a living lab approach//In: 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2009. HICSS 2009, P. 1-10. IEEE (2009).
  8. H. Chesbrough. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 2003.
  9. European Comission. Growing a digital social innovation ecosystem for Europe DSI final report. European Union, 2015. https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/50-nesta-dsireport-growing_a_digital_social_innovation_ecosystem_for_europe.pdf.
  10. L. A. Gamidullaeva, T. O. Tolstykh. Transaction Costs, Institutions and Regional Innovation Development: the Case of Russia//Proceedings of the 30th International Business Information Management Association Conference (IBIMA) 8-9 November 2017 Madrid Spain. Vision 2020: Sustainable Economic development, Innovation Management, and Global Growth.
  11. P. A. Gloor. Collaborative Innovation through Swarm Creativity,’ Swarm Creativity. 19-48. 2006. https://doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195304121.003.0003
  12. A. Habibipour, A. Padyab, B. Bergvall-Kеreborn, A. Stеhlbrцst. Exploring Factors Influencing Participant Drop-Out Behavior in a Living Lab Environment/In: S. Stigberg, J. Karlsen, H. Holone, C. Linnes (eds.)//Nordic Contributions in IS Research. SCIS 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Vol 294. Springer, Cham. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64695-4_3.
  13. B. Ley, C. Ogonowski, M. Mu et al. At home with users: a comparative view of living labs//Interact. Comput. 27. 2015. 21-35.
  14. Z. Liu, D.-S. Yang, D. Wen et al. Cyber-physical-social systems for command and control//IEEE Intelligent Systems. 2011. Vol. 26. №. 4. P. 92-96.
  15. M. Rothschild. Bionomics. Economy as Ecosystem. NY.: Henry Holt and Company Inc., 1990. 423 р.
  16. A. Sheth, P. Anantharam, C. Henson. Physical-cyber-social computing: An early 21st century approach//IEEE Intelligent Systems. 2013. Vol. 28. №. 1. P. 78-82.
  17. A. Stеhlbrцst, B. Bergvall-Kеreborn. Voluntary contributors in open innovation processes/In: J. S. Z. Eriksson-Lundstrцm, M. Wiberg, S. Hrastinski, M. Edenius, P. J. Еgerfalk (eds.)//Managing Open Innovation Technologies. Springer, Berlin, 2013. P. 133-149.
  18. S. Vasin, L. Gamidullaeva. Regional reproduction of innovations and development of network approach//TsITISE. 2017. № 4 (13).

 

 

Authors