Improving the value of innovation projects

In the article some aspects of value-based management — VBM are considered, when creating projects. The VBM is a rapidly developing direction of the organization’s management. Based on the latest standards, the value and levels of its presentation are defined. The methods of managing the organization are analyzed and the advantages of the VBM are discussed, for which the basic principles are formulated. The authors pay attention to the creation of consumer value and highlight the issues of creating innovative value and harmonizing the relations of all stakeholders, leading to a synergistic effect of improving value. The classification of mathematical and economic methods is given and it is specified that in the conditions of obtaining fuzzy, incomplete and non-numeric information it is necessary to apply to methods of non-numerical statistics. As an example, an algorithm for assessing the harmonization of stakeholder values is provided. Considering issues of informational support of the Center, the authors briefly describe the innovative intellectual information system of Russian development: Klado (St. Petersburg, Klado Ltd., author V. Yu. Khankov). This system has found practical application in the University of aerospace instrumentation (SUAI), and the staff of SUAA are participating in the improvement of the «Klado» system, which has proved effective in practical applications in various areas of the national economy. The recommendations suggested in this article can be used to create innovative projects of various orientations

Keywords: value-based management; value of innovations; harmonization of values of stakeholders; innovative intellectual, information systems

References

  1. Azgal'dov G.G., Kostin A.V., Sadovov V.V. Kvalimetrija dlja vseh/— M.: ID InformZnanie, 2012. — 165 s. (In Russian).
  2. 2.Antohina Ju. A., Varzhapetjan A. G., Semenova E. G. Cennostno-orientirovannoe upravlenie innovacionnymi proektami // Voprosy radiojelektroniki. 2017. № 5. S. (In Russian)
  3. Antohina Ju.A., Varzhapetjan A.G., Semenova E.G  Informacionnaja podderzhka  processov uluchshenija kachestva  tehnicheskih ob#ektov. SPb, Politehnika,2016 g. 315 s. (In Russian)
  4. Antohina Ju.A. i dr. Upravlenie riskami innovacionnoj dejatel'nosti v radiojelektronnoj promyshlennosti. SPb.  Politehnika, 2017 g. 335 s. (In Russian)
  5. Antohina Ju.A., Varzhapetjan A.G., Han'kov V.Ju. Nekotorye aspekty situacionnogo upravlenija proektami SPb Jekonomika i upravlenie №7 2016g. s. 29-34. (In Russian)
  6. Antohina Ju.A., Varzhapetjan A.G., Sol'nicev R.I. Uluchshenie kachestva funkcionirovanija organizaciej pri upravlenii po rezul'tatam SPb Jekonomika i upravlenie. № 11,2016 g.s 19-25. (In Russian)
  7. Bushuev S.D Bushuev S.D., Bushueva N.S. Mehanizmy formirovanija cennosti v dejatel'nosti proektno-upravljaemyh organizacij// Vostochno-Evropejskij zhurnal peredovyh tehnologij. — Vyp.1/2 (43). — Har'kov, 2010. (In Russian)
  8. Bushuev S.D. i dr. Kreativnye tehnologii upravlenija proektami i programmami Kiev, Sammit kniga,2010, 768 s. (In Russian)
  9. Vumek Dzhejms P., Dzhons Daniel T. Berezhlivoe proizvodstvo. Kak izbavit'sja ot poter' i dobit'sja procvetanija vashej kompanii. M.,: «Al'pina Pablisher», 2011, 318 s. (In Russian)
  10. GOST R 55.0.01-2014/ISO 55001:2014 Upravlenie aktivami. Obshhee predstavlenie, principy i terminologija. M. Standartinform. 2016 g. 15 s. (In Russian)
  11. GOST R ISO 9000:2015 Sistemy menedzhmenta kachestva. Osnovnye polozhenija i slovar'. M. Standartinform. 2015, 24 s. (In Russian)
  12. GOST R ISO 9001:2015 Sistemy menedzhmenta kachestva. Trebovanija. M. Standartinform. 2015, 24 s. (In Russian)
  13. 13 GOST  R ISO 9004:2010 Menedzhment v celjah dostizhenija ustojchivogo uspeha organizacii. Podhod na osnove menedzhmenta kachestva. M. Standartinform. 2011, 41 s. (In Russian)
  14. GOST R 53647.1 -2015 Menedzhment nepreryvnosti biznesa. Chast' 1. Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo M. Standartinform. 2015, 48 s. (In Russian)
  15. GOST R 54598.х – 2015 Menedzhment ustojchivogo razvitija. Rukovodstvo. M. Standartinform. 2016, 28 s. (In Russian)
  16. GOST R 56020-2014 Berezhlivoe proizvodstvo. Osnovnye polozhenija i slovar' M. Standartinform. 2011, 41 s. (In Russian)
  17. Grigorjan, T. G. Sovershenstvovanie modelej cennostno- orientirovannogo upravlenija portfeljami proektov rekonstrukcii sistem vodosnabzhenija // Vostochno-evropejskij zhurnal peredovyh tehnologij. – 2015. – № 3 (74). – S. 43–49. (In Russian)
  18. Majdzher, K. Cennostno-orientirovannoe upravlenie. Revoljucionnyj podhod k dostizheniju uspeha v biznese i lichnomu procvetaniju. / Rostov n/D: «Feniks», 2005. – 152s. (In Russian)
  19. Prigozhin A.I Celi i cennosti: Novye metody raboty s budushhim .Izdatel'stvo: Delo 2010 S.  432. (In Russian)
  20. Sajt OOO «Klado» http://www.clado.com Data obrashhenija 11.03.2017
  21. Svod znanij po upravleniju biznes processami: BPM CBOK 3.0 / Pod red. A.A. Belajchuka, V.G. Elifjorova»: Al'pina Pablisher; Moskva; 2016 346 s. (In Russian)
  22. Solozhencev E. D. I3-tehnologii dlja jekonomiki. – SPb.: Nauka, 2011. (In Russian)
  23. Tajiti Ono. Proizvodstvennaja sistema Tojoty: uhodja ot massovogo proizvodstva. — M: Izdatel'stvo IKSI, 2012, 287 s. (In Russian)
  24. Fedjukin V. K. Kvalimetrija. Izmerenie kachestva promyshlennoj produkcii: M.: KNORUS, 2013. - 316 s.  (In Russian)
  25. Kano, Noriaki; Nobuhiku Seraku; Fumio Takahashi; Shinichi Tsuji (April 1984). "Attractive quality and must-be quality". Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control (in Japanese). 14 (2): 39–48.
  26. Ogayo R. Goals can kill а company - Goals are Destroying the US// URL :http://demingcollaboration.com/goals-can-kill-a-company-part-ii/, дата обращения 11.03.2017
  27. P2M A guide of Project&Program management for enterprise innovation/ Japan PMAJ, 2008 138 p.

Authors