Development of Technological Entrepreneurship: The Role of Universities

Performing the country's innovative potential draws attention to the study of the universities’ role in innovative activities, both as a source of knowledge generation and as a full participant in the commercialization process. Modern concepts of innovative interaction recognize the growing role of universities and note the importance of creating effective mechanisms for the integration into joint projects with the business community. The creation of an entrepreneurial ecosystem and the development of academic entrepreneurship are important elements in the formation of integration ties

Keywords: technological entrepreneurship, national innovation system, entrepreneurial ecosystem, university, triple helix concept, academic entrepreneurship


  1. Atkinson, R. D.; Ezell, S. J.; Stewart, L. A. The Global Innovation Policy Index. Information Technology and Innovation Foundation and the Kauffman Foundation, 2012.
  2. Bischoff K., Volkmann C., Audretsch D. Stakeholder collaboration in entrepreneurship education: an analysis of the entrepreneurial ecosystemsof European higher educational institutions. J TechnolTransf 43:20–46–017–9581–0
  3. Boh, W. F., De-Haan, U., & Strom, R. University technology transfer through entrepreneurship: Faculty and students in spinoffs. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 2016, 661–669.
  4. Chandler, D., & Werther, W. B., Jr. (2014). Strategic corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders, globalization and sustainable value creation. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc.
  5. Criaco, G., Minola, T., Migliorini, P., & Serarols-Tarrés, C. (2014). “To have and have not”: Founders’ human capital and university start-up survival. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39, 567–593.
  6. Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. The Triple Helix: University — Industry — Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge-Based Economic Development. EASST Review 14, 1995, 14–19.
  7. Freeman, R. E. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. 1984, Boston: Pitman.
  8. Hayter, C. S., & Link, A. N. On the economic impact of university proof of concept centers. Journal of Technology Transfer, 40, 2015, 178–183.
  9. Huyghe, A., Knockaert, M., Piva, E., & Wright, M. Are researchers deliberately bypassing the technology transfer office? An analysis of TTO awareness. Small Business Economics, 47, 2016, 589–607.
  10. Kalar, B., & Antoncic, B. The entrepreneurial university, academic activities and technology and knowledge transfer in four European countries. Technovation, 36, 2015, 1–11.
  11. Karlsson, T., & Wigren, C. Start-ups among university employees: The influence of legitimacy, human capital and social capital. Journal of Technology Transfer, 37, 2012, 297–312.
  12. Kolb, C., & Wagner, M.. Crowding in or crowding out: The link between academic entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial traits. Journal of Technology Transfer, 40, 2015, 387–408.
  13. Mason, C., & Brown, R. Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth-oriented entrepreneurship.Working Paper. Den Haag. 2014.
  14. Neck HM, Meyer GD, Cohen B, Corbett AC. An entrepreneurial system view of newventure creation. J Small Bus Manage 42 (2):190–208.2004.
  15. Perkmann, M., King, Z., & Pavelin, S. Engaging Excellence? Effects of faculty quality on university engagement with industry. Research Policy, 40, 2011, 539–552.
  16. Rasmussen, E., & Wright, M. How can universities facilitate academic spin-offs? An entrepreneurial competency perspective. Journal of Technology Transfer, 40, 2015, 782–799.
  17. Rizzo, U. Why do scientists create academic spin-offs? The influence of the context. Journal of Technology Transfer, 40, 2015, 198–226.
  18. Shane, S. Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and WealthCreation. Edward Elgar Publishing. 2003.
  19. Barkov A. V., Grishina Y. S. “UNIVERSITY 3.0”: legal model of university participation. Bulletin of the Baltic Federal University. I. Kant. Ser.: Humanities and social sciences. 2017. No. 3. S. 5–15.
  20. Zinevich O. V., Balmasova T. A. On the way of modernization: the mission of the university in regional development. Vocational education in the modern world. 2018. Vol. 8, No. 3
  21. Karpov A. Modern university as a driver of economic growth: models and missions. Questions of Economics. 2017. No 3. P. 58–76.
  22. Kuznetsov E., Engovatova A. “Universities 4.0”: growth points of the knowledge economy in Russia. INNOVATIONS No. 5 (211), 2016.
  23. Neborsky E. V. Reconstruction of the university model: transition to format 4.0//World of Science Internet Journal 2017, Volume 5, Number 4.