The state of science in Russian regions: problems of correct estimates

The article is aimed to propose ways to improve approaches to evaluate the state of science in regions based on the generalization of existing studies on the patterns of spatial development of science and education, as well as the analysis of statistical data. The usefulness of independent evaluation of the state of science in regions (and not scientific and technological or innovative development) is justified. Proposals are formulated to clarify the role of the teaching staff in conducting scientific research and to more correctly estimation of the number of researchers in the equivalent of full employment, to positioning of universities in terms of their role in training scientific personnel and improving the quality of higher education statistics, to develop a balanced approach to assessing the age composition of researchers, to conduct multi-scale evaluations — not only by regions, but also by cities and macroregions. It is proposed to pay more attention to the evaluation of the ratio between the role of the state and business in the development of science in regions, the interaction of universities, scientific organizations and enterprises

Keywords: research and development, innovative development, regional development, science, higher education, macro-regions, cities


  1. Kuznetsova O. V. Methodological approaches to the assessment of scientific activity of Russian regions. Federalizm [Federalism], 2022, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 61–65 (in Russian).
  2. Abashkin V. L., Abdrakhmanova G. I., Bredikhin S. V. et al. Reyting innovatsionnogo razvitiya sub»ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Russian Regional Innovation Scoreboard]. Issue 7. Ed. by L. M. Gokhberg. Moscow, HSE Universtiry, 2021, 274 p. (in Russian)
  3. Gulin K. A., Mazilov E. A., Kuz’min I. V., Alfer’ev D. A., Ermolov A. P. Problemy i napravleniya razvitiya nauchno-tekhnologicheskogo potentsiala territoriy [Problems and directions of development of scientific and technological potential of territories]. Vologda, 2017, 123 p. (in Russian)
  4. Zadumkin K. A., Kondakov I. A. Nauchno-tekhnicheskiy potentsial regiona: otsenka sostoyaniya i perspektivy razvitiya [Scientific and technical potential of the region: assessment of the state and prospects of development]. Vologda, 2010. 205 p. (in Russian)
  5. Zolotukhina A. V. Estimation of scientific and technical capacity of the Russia’s regions: domestic practice and the international recommendations. Ekonomicheskie I gumanitarnye issledovaniya regionov [Economic and humanitarian studies of the regions], 2012, no. 4, pp. 97–108 (in Russian).
  6. Netrebin Yu.Yu., Ulyakina N. A., Vershinin I. V., Burdakova A. E. Scientific, technological and innovative capacity of the region: comparison of current approaches to evaluation. Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy, resheniya [Economics and management: problems, solutions], 2020, vol. 1, no. 10, pp. 107–116 (in Russian).
  7. Baburin V. L., Zemtsov S. P. [Theoretical and methodological approaches to economic-geographicalresearch of innovation processes]. Teoreticheskie i metodicheskie podkhody v ekonomicheskoy i sotsial’noy geografii [Theoretical and methodological approaches in economic and social geography. Collection of articles]. Moscow, 2019, pp. 6–45 (in Russian).
  8. Sun Y., Wen K. Uncertainties, Imitative Behaviours and Foreign R&D Location: Explaining the Over-Сoncentration of Foreign R&D in Beijing and Shanghai within China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 2007, vol. 13, no. 3. pp. 405–424.
  9. Crescenzi R., Rodríguez-Pose A., Storper M. The Territorial Dynamics of Innovation: A Europe-United States Comparative Analysis. Journal of Economic Geography, 2007, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 673–709.
  10. Erdin C., Ozkaya G. R&D Investments and Quality of Life in Turkey. Heliyon, 2020, vol. 6, no. 5, 9 p.
  11. Eurostat Regional Yearbook. 2021 Edition. Luxembourg, 2021, 210 p.
  12. Brumshteyn Yu. M., Zakharyan M.Yu. Distribution of scientists by Russian inhabited points and regions: comparison of official statistics data and information about printing activity. Naukovedenie [Science Studies], 2017, vol. 9, no. 4, 28 p. (in Russian).
  13. Kaneva M. V., Untura G. A. Modeli otsenki vliyaniya ekonomiki znaniy na ekonomicheskiy rost i innovatsii regionov [Models for assessing the impact of the knowledge economy on economic growth and innovation of regions]. Ed. by V. I. Suslov. Novosibirsk, 2021, 256 p. (in Russian)
  14. Crescenzi R. R&D, Innovative Collaborations and the Role of Public Policies. In book: The Economics of Big Science. Essays by Leading Scientists and Policymakers. Ed. By Beck H. P., Charitos P. Springer, 2021, pp. 99–104.
  15. Crescenzi R., Rodríguez-Pose A. R&D, Socio-Economic Conditions, and Regional Innovation in the U. S. Growth and Change, 2013, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 287–320.
  16. Sterlacchini A. R&D, Higher Education and Regional Growth: Uneven Linkages among European Regions. Research Policy, 2008, no. 37, pp. 1096–1107.
  17. Malinovskiy S. S., Shibanova E.Yu. Regional differentiation of accessibility of higher education in Russia (Series «Modern Education Analytics», no. 13 (43)). Moscow, HSE University, 2020, 68 p. (in Russia)
  18. Prostranstvennaya organizatsiya vysshey shkoly i regional’noe razvitie [Spatial organization of higher education and regional development]. Ed. by A. P. Katrovskiy, S. P. Evdokimov, T. I. Yas’kovoy. Smolensk, 2022, 311 p (in Russian).
  19. Maslyukova E. V., Vol’chik V. V., Maskaev A. I. et al. Vypuskniki universitetov kak novyy precariat [University graduates as a new precariat]. Rostov-na-Donu; Taganrog, 2021,164 p. (in Russian)
  20. Audretsch D. B. The Innovative Advantage of US Cities. European Planning Studies, 2002, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 165–176.
  21. Carlino G. A. Knowledge spillovers: Cities’ Role in the New Economy. Business review (Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia), 2001, Q4, pp. 17–26.
  22. Agirrechu A. A. Naukogrady Rossii: istoriya formirovaniya i razvitiya [Science cities of Russia: the history of formation and development]. Moscow, 2009, 192 p. (in Russian)
  23. Ivanov V. V., Matirko V. I. Naukogrady Rossii: ot metodologii k praktike [Science cities of Russia: from methodology to practice.]. Moscow, 2011, 142 p. (in Russian)
  24. Belderbos R., Du S., Somers D. Global Cities as Innovation Hubs: The Location of R&D Investments by Multinational Firms. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2016, no. 1, 32 p.
  25. Castellani D., Lavoratori K. Location of R&D Abroad — An Analysis on Global Cities. In: Relocation of Economic Activity. Ed. by Capik P., Dej M. Springer, 2019, pp. 145–162.
  26. Kuznetsova O. V. Alternative approaches to specify the role macro-regions of Russia in the system of public administration. Federalizm [Federalism], 2019, no. 4, pp. 112–125 (in Russian).
  27. Bilbao-Osorio B., Rodríguez-Pose A. From R&D to Innovation and Economic Growth in the EU. Growth and Change, 2004, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 434–455.
  28. Min S., Kim J., Sawng Y.-W. The Effect of Innovation Network Size and Public R&D Investment on Regional Innovation Efficiency. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2020, vol. 155 (C), 13 p.
  29. Rodríguez-Pose A. Is R&D Investment in Lagging Areas of Europe Worthwhile? Theory and Empirical Evidence. Papers in Regional Studies, 2001, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 275–295.
  30. Fritsch M. Does R&D‑Cooperation Behavior Differ between Regions? Industry and Innovation, 2003, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 25–39.