The research is focused on the formation of ideas about the seventh techno-economic paradigm — a fundamentally new stage of development of science and technology, the beginning of which is expected within the next decades. Scientific articles in various scientific fields, particularly in the field of scientific foresight, were used as a basis for the hypotheses about the development of the seventh techno-economic paradigm. The findings were grouped into two main scenarios for the development of the seventh techno-economic paradigm. An alternative scenario was the representation generated by the GPT-4 artificial neural network — its use is due to the ability to generate texts based on a surface analysis of open sources of information provided by the artificial neural network. To validate the results provided by the neural network, a simplified Turing test was conducted on 116 respondents, which revealed a low degree of difference between human and machine representations of the seventh techno-economic paradigm. As a result of this study, the paper summarizes three main scenarios of the seventh technological mode: transhumanist paradigm, ecological paradigm (both formed by the analytical group), and intelligent machine paradigm (formed by the neural network). Based on this study, a conclusion is made about the possible prospectivity of research in these areas. It is noted that the mentioned directions of science and technology development are hypothetical and will not necessarily represent the real seventh techno-economic paradigm.
Keywords: techno-economic paradigm, scientific foresight, futurology, transhumanism, ecology, intelligent machines, artificial intelligence, artificial neural network.
References
- L. I. Lopatnikov. Economic and Mathematical Dictionary: Dictionary of Modern Economics/Edited by G. B. Kleiner; Academy of National Economy under the Government of the Russian Federation. 5th edition, revision and additions. Moscow: Delo, 2003. 519 p.
- N. D. Kondratiev. Large Cycles of Economic Conjuncture: Report//Problems of Economic Dynamics. M.: Ekonomika, 1989. P. 172-226. 523 p.
- В. V. Ivanov, G. G. Malinetsky. Philosophical foundations of the humanitarian-technological revolution//Philosophical Sciences. 2019. Vol. 62. № 4. P. 76-95. doi: 10.30727/0235-1188-2019-62-4-76-95.
- A. A. Akaev. Modern financial and economic crisis in the light of the theory of inno-vation-technological development of economy and innovation process management//System monitoring. Global and regional development. Moscow: URSS, 2009. P. 141-162.
- M. J. Spaniol, N. J. Rowland. Defining scenario//Futures Foresight Sci. 2019. 1:e1.
- S. Yu. Glazyev. Prospects for the formation of a new VI technological mode in the world//MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Development). 2010. № 2. P. 4-10.
- A. V. Kozachek. The seventh technological mode: possible global environmental problems and relevant aspects of professional training of environmental engineer//Izvestiya Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2015. № 5-2. P. 477-489.
- L. Cannavacciuolo, G. Ferraro, C. Ponsiglione et al. Technological innovation-enabling industry 4.0 paradigm: A systematic literature review//Technovation. 2023. Vol. 124. 102733.
- The Great Digital Revolution: Challenges and Prospects for the Economy of the XXI Century. Glazyev.ru. https://glazev.ru/articles/6-jekonomika/54923-velikaja-tsifrovaja-revoljutsija-vyzovy-i-perspektivy-dlja-jekonomiki-i-veka.
- Systems Theory. ScienceDirect Topics. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/psychology/systems-theory.
- V. Petrov. Fundamentals of TRIZ. Theory of Inventive Problem Solving. 3rd edition, revised and supplemented. Moscow: «Publishing Solutions», 2023. 1099 p.
- E. M. Rogers. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition. New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 2003. 576 p.
- A. Linden, J. Finn. Understanding Gartner's hype cycles//Gartner Research. 2003. 12 p.
- D. M. Kovba, E. G. Gribovod. Theoretical aspects of the phenomenon of transhuman-ism: main directions//Discourse-Pi. 2019. № 3 (36).
- Е. D. Meleshko. Transhumanism and digital ethics//Humanitarian Vedomosti TSPU n. a. L. N. Tolstoy. 2021. № 2 (38).
- Е. R. Khabirova, R. S. Arakelyan, L. A. Isaeva et al. One Step Before Reality or the Non-Volatile Idea of Scientists: Transhumanism — both for and against//MNIJ. 2021. № 10-2 (112).
- M. Battle-Fisher. Transhuman, posthuman and complex humanness in the 21st century//Ethics, Medicine and Public Health. 2020. Vol. 13. 100400.
- F. Galibert. Transhumanism: From dream to nightmare//Bulletin de l'Acadйmie Nationale de Mйdecine. 2020. № 9. Vol. 204. Supplement. P. e160-e163.
- R. Benedikter, J. Giordano, K. Fitzgerald. The future of the self-image of the human being in the Age of Transhumanism, Neurotechnology and Global Transition//Futures. 2010. № 10. Vol. 42. P. 1102-1109.
- M. Barbarino. Charting the International Roadmap to a Demonstration Fusion Power Plant. International Atomic Energy Agency. https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/charting-the-international-roadmap-to-a-demonstration-fusion-power-plant.
- K. de Koning, J. Broekhuijsen, I. Kьhn et al. Digital twins: dynamic model-data fusion for ecology//Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2023. 12 p. (Article in press.)
- A. P. Woolnough, L. C. L. Hollenberg, P. Cassey, T. A. A. Prowse. Quantum computing: a new paradigm for ecology//Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2023. № 8. Vol. 38. P. 727-735.
- S. Cui, Y. Gao, Y. Huang et al. Advances and applications of machine learning and deep learning in environmental ecology and health//Environmental Pollution. 2023. Vol. 335. 122358.
- О. Valieva. Innovation in ecology//Theory and practice of modern science. 2021. № 7 (73). P. 46-48.
- M. M. Mukhlynina. Actual legal and organizational issues of the implementation of the national project «Ecology»//Education and Law. 2023. № 5. P. 256-259.
- Е. V. Zharov. Management of the system of public interests in the conditions of trans-formationmation of economic relations//Agrarnoe i zemlennoe pravo. 2023. № 1 (217). P. 105-108.
Authors