On the formation of a new paradigm of innovative systems

In the context of the formation of a multi-level and multi-dimensional «system of ecosystems» of national knowledge, social meta-management and national economy, the innovation system plays the role of a multi-network system of strategic links that complements the operational interaction between ecosystem institutions. The organizational and structural mechanisms of the innovation system should ensure the innovative and mutually supported development of each of the ecosystems, ensuring global competitiveness and security, a favorable future for the country in the face of fierce global hypercompetition for the future. The article deals with the problems of transformation and coordinated development of the ecosystems of knowledge, economy and meta-management of the country and the role of the innovation system that ensures their adaptation, strategic connectivity and global competitiveness in the context of continuous transformation of the deep foundations of the modern world order. To maintain the integrity and relevance of the knowledge space, the ability to predict development, it is necessary to move to models whose complexity approaches the complexity of the real world, which, in turn, requires the creation of a new «multi-network» organizational and management model for science, economics and management, as well as a linking their innovation ecosystem. For complex systems, traditional tools are complemented by new ones — living laboratories, intelligent repositories and digital passports of Russian researchers. The proposed organizational and structural solution has a high potential for the formation of an innovatively developing human-oriented model of the economy and a fundamental increase in labor productivity and the gross domestic product of Russia.

Keywords: innovative development of the economy, knowledge ecosystem, innovative ecotone, improvement of science, multi-network, living laboratories, intelligent repositories, researcher's digital passport

References

  1. I. A. Karachev. Transnational corporations in the modern world economy: teaching aid. Yaroslavl: YarGU n. a. P. G. Demidov. 2019. 72 p.
  2. Niharika Hariharan Joshi, Hamza Khan, Istvan Tab. A design-led approach to embracing an ecosystem strategy. McKinsey & Company, July 2021. 6 p.
  3. M. Mazzucato Preventing digital feudalism, 9th October 2019. https://socialeurope.eu/preventing-digital-feudalism.
  4. Ecosystems: approaches to regulation. Report for public consultations. M.: Central Bank of the Russian Federation, 2021. 46 p.
  5. The 5th Science and Technology Basic Plan, Government of Japan, January 22, 2016. 74 p.
  6. Proposed Standard Practice For Surveys Of Research And Development, OECD, 1963. 60 p.
  7. OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, OECD Publishing, Paris. 402 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264239012-en.
  8. Oslo leadership. Recommendations for collecting and analyzing data on innovation. Third edition. Joint publication by OECD and Eurostat/Transl. from English. M.: State Institution «Center for Research and Statistics of Science» (CISN), 2010. 107 p.
  9. OECD/Eurostat (2018), Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th Edition, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, OECD Publishing, Paris/Eurostat, Luxembourg. 258 p. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en.
  10. The Lisbon Strategy 2000-2010 An analysis and evaluation of the methods used and results achieved, European Parliament's Committee on Employment and Social Affairs. 277 p.
  11. Innovation and Growth: Rationale for an Innovation Strategy. OECD, 2007. 29 p.
  12. The Innovation Principle. European Comission, 2019. 2 p.
  13. Strategic Plan 2020-2024 DG Research and Innovation. European Comission, 2020. 59 p.
  14. Ya. Yu. Vasiliev. The Oedipus effect and its epistemological analysis//Philosophical research. 2006. № 3. P. 127-141.
  15. Methodology for determining technology readiness levels. https://legalacts.ru/doc/metodika-opredelenija-urovnei-gotovnosti-tekhnologii-v-ramkakh-proektov-federalnoi.
  16. GOST R 58048-2017. Technology transfer. Guidelines for assessing the level of technology maturity. M.: Standartinform, 2018. 41 p.
  17. 100 Radical Innovation Breakthroughs for the future. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019. 339 p.
  18. Sepehr Ghazinoory, Fred Phillips, Masoud Afshari-Mofrad, Nasrin Bigdeloud. Innovation lives in ecotones, not ecosystems//Journal of Business Research, Vol. 135. October, 2021. P. 572-580.
  19. K. Christensen Why do we need a theory of non-elephants? https://www.imperial.ac.uk/events/114256/why-do-we-need-a-theory-of-non-elephants.
  20. V. Vorozhikhin, I. Karnaukh. Living laboratories. successful foreign experience in supporting the innovative development of self-government//Self-management. 2019. Vol. 1. № 3 (116). P. 61-65.
  21. Future Services & Societal Systems in Society 5.0. Held on Monday, November 7, 2016, CRDS-FY2016-WR-13: Center for Research and Development Strategy, Japan Science and Technology Agency. 226 p.
  22. Nate Sirirojvisuth Methodology to assess cost and schedule impact using System and Technology Readiness Level (SRL/TRL), 8 PRICE Systems, LLC, 2019. 37 p.

Authors