Industrial symbiosis in the system of inter-firm cooperation: best practices

The article presents the results of a study of four international and two Russian practices of industrial symbiosis implementation. The study identified the industries that are most likely to form industrial symbiotic chains, identified models of such chains formation and the presence of a dependence of environmental effect on the number of end-products used in the symbiosis

Keywords: inter-firm cooperation, circular economy, industrial symbiosis, industrial symbiosis chains, models of industrial symbiosis chains formation

References

  1. M. R. Avrora. Ekologicheskaya ekonomika i ekonomika okruzhayushchey sredy: genezis, sootnosheniye i problemy//Tvorchestvo molodykh uchenykh. № 1-3. 2017. S. 161- 166.
  2. E. G. Belova, L. V. KHoreva. TSirkulyarnaya ekonomika i promyshlennyy simbioz uluchshat blagosostoyaniye i sokhranyat planetu//Peterburg predlagayet. 2019. № 3. S. 25-27.
  3. I. Yu. Blam, K. Borsekova, K. Petrikova. Evolyutsiya territorial’nykh ekologo-ekonomicheskikh ob”yedineniy: promyshlennyy simbioz//Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya. 2014. № 2. S. 185-200.
  4. N. V Pakhomova, K. K. Rikhter, M. A. Vetrova. Perekhod k tsirkulyarnoy ekonomike i zamknutym tsepyam postavok kak faktor ustoychivogo razvitiya//Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 5. Ekonomika. 2017. Vyp. 2. S. 244-269.
  5. Rasporyazheniye Pravitel’stva RF ot 25 iyulya 2017 g. № 1589-r v sootvetstvii so stat’yey 12 Federal’nogo zakona «Ob otkhodakh proizvodstva i potrebleniya».
  6. L. V. Khoreva, A. L. Belykh, A. V. Shrayer. Ekosistema kak innovatsionnaya forma setevoy mezhfirmennoy kooperatsii//Informatsionno-ekonomicheskiye aspekty standartizatsii i tekhnicheskogo regulirovaniya. 2019. № 6 (52). S. 48-53.
  7. L. V. Khoreva. Ustoychivoye razvitiye i korporativnaya sotsial’naya otvetstvennost’: novyye aktsenty//Materialy konferentsii «Realizatsiya tseley ustoychivogo razvitiya: evropeyskiy i rossiyskiy opyt». SPb.: Izd-vo SPbG•EU, 2019.
  8. E. Andersson, O. Arfwidsson, V. Bergstrand et al. Industrial Symbiosis in Stenungsund. 2013. http://www.industriellekologi.se/symbiosis/stenungsund.html.
  9. L. Baas. Planning and uncovering industrial symbiosis: Comparing the Rotterdam and Цstergцtland regions//Business Strategy and the Environment, 20, 428-440, 2011.
  10. R. Branson. Re-constructing Kalundborg: the reality of bilateral symbiosis and other insights//Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 4344-4352, 2016.
  11. M. Chertow, J. Ehrenfeld. Organizing Self-Organizing Systems//Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16(1), 13-27. 2012.
  12. R. Clift, A. Druckman. Taking Stock of Industrial Ecology, 2016. 362 p.
  13. T. Domenech, M. Davies. Structure and morphology of industrial symbiosis networks: The case of Kalundborg//Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 10, 79-89, 2011.
  14. H. Dong, S. Ohnishi, T. Fujita et al. Achieving carbon emission reduction through industrial & urban symbiosis: A case of Kawasaki//Energy, 64, 277-286, 2014.
  15. L. Dong, H. Zhang, T. Fujita et al. Environmental and economic gains of industrial symbiosis for Chinese iron/steel industry: Kawasaki’s experience and practice in Liuzhou and Jinan//Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 226-238, 2013.
  16. J. R. Duflou, J. W. Sutherland, D. Dornfeld et al. Towards energy and resource efficient manufacturing: A process and system approach//CIRP Annals — Manufacturing Technology. V. 61. № 2. 2012. P. 587-609.
  17. S. Hashimoto, T. Fujita, Y. Geng, E. Nagasawa. Realizing CO2 emission reduction through industrial symbiosis: A cement production case study for Kawasaki. Resources// Conservation and Recycling, 54 (10), 704-710, 2010.
  18. J. Martнnez-Alier, R. Muradian. Handbook of Ecological Economics, Edward Elgar Pub publisher, Cheltenham, UK, 2015. 512 p.
  19. K. Petrнkovб, K. Borsekovб, I. Blam. Industrial symbiosis in European policy: overview of recent progress Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica. 2. 2016
  20. F. Royne, J. Berlin, E. Ringstrцm. Life cycle perspective in environmental strategy development on the industry cluster level: A case study of five chemical companies//Journal of Cleaner Production, 86, 125-131, 2015.
  21. R. Van Berkel, T. Fujita, S. Hashimoto, Y. Geng. Industrial and urban symbiosis in Japan: Analysis of the Eco-Town program 1997-2006//Journal of Environmental Management, 90 (3), 1544-1556, 2009.
  22. R. Van Berkel, T. Fujita, H. Shisuka, M. Fujii. Quantitative assessment of urban and industrial symbiosis in Kawasaki, Japan//Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 1271e1281. 2009.
  23. C. Yu, C. Davis, G. P. J. Dijkema. Understanding the Evolution of Industrial Symbiosis Research//Journal of Industrial Ecology. 18 (2), 280-293, 2013.

Authors