Choice of technologies for wood waste realization within the formation and the development of circular economy in the wood cluster

The article is devoted to the development of an integrated modeling of the wood cluster through the example of the Tomsk region in order to effectively introduce technologies for solving the problem of wood waste and ensure the sustainable development (SD) of the industry as a whole. In this article, based on the results of works [1, 2] and the need to develop a circular economy strategy (CE), are conducted 1) the modeling of the technology selection process, 2) the selection of indicators for assessing effectiveness and 3) the modeling of the CE technologies introduction through the example of the forestry park «Asinovsky». This paper shows the existence of many ways to achieve goals of CE and actors (stakeholders), whose interests may not be agreed upon and often may contradict each other. CE approach should include in the focus of the wood industry 1) environmental and social indicators for achieving SD goals and 2) territorial features of the forestry activity. As a result, a procedure (method) for technology selection of wood waste realization and their application in the wood cluster is proposed. Considering practical experience allows a deeper understanding of the problems and to verify the study conclusions

Keywords: wood cluster, waste, circular economy, sustainable development, system analysis, soft system analysis, modeling, integrated modeling

References

  1. B. Kalyuzhnyj, E. A. Monastyrnyj. Analiz problem razvitiya lesopromyshlennogo kompleksa pri formirovanii modeli ekonomiki zamknutogo cikla na primere Tomskoj oblasti// Innovacii. № 3. 2019. S. 86-93.
  2. B. Kalyuzhnyj, E. A. Monastyrnyj. Kompleksnoe modelirovanie lesopromyshlennyh kompleksov v paradigme ustojchivogo razvitiya i formirovaniya ekonomiki zamknutogo cikla//Innovacii. № 3. 2020. S. 85-94.
  3. V. I. Zaprudnov, S. P. Karpachev, M. A. Bykovskij. Tekhnologii i tekhnicheskie sredstva processov lesosechnyh rabot//Lesnoj vestnik. T. 21. № 1. 2017. S. 108-117.
  4. Plan Lesoupravleniya. OOO «Tomlesdrev», g. Tomsk, 2018.
  5. G. F. Prokof'ev, N. Yu. Miklovcik, A. M. Tyurin. Novye lesopil'nye moduli dlya ispol'zovaniya v gibkih avtomatizirovannyh lesopil'nyh liniyah//Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Lesnoj zhurnal. Severnyj (Arkticheskij) federal'nyj universitet im. M. V. Lomonosova (Arhangel'sk). № 1 (349). 2016. S. 131-137.
  6. A. M. Gazizov, A. I. Islamuratov. Povyshenie effektivnosti lesopil'nogo proizvodstva//Simvol Nauki (Ufa). T. 2. № 3. 2017. S. 47-49.
  7. A. Geldron. Economie circulaire: notions (Fiche Technique). ADEME. 2014. https://www.ademe.fr/sites/default/files/assets/documents/fiche-technique-economie-circulaireoct-2014.pdf.
  8. B. Kalioujny. J. Ermushko. Could RRI approach play key role in establishment of circular economy?//The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS), 2017. Vol.26: Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI 2016). International Conference 07-10 November 2016. Tomsk. Russian Federation. P. 341-348.
  9. Prognoz razvitiya lesnogo sektora Rossijskoj Federacii do 2030 goda. Prodovol'stvennaya i Sel'skohozyajstvennaya Organizaciya Ob»edinennyh Nacij, Rim, 2012.
  10. ONF (Office d National des Forets). Rapport d’activite. 2015.
  11. Project «Durabilitй»: vers une amelioration de la duree de vie des ouvrages exterieurs en bois. FCBA INFO. 2010.
  12. V. V. Trut'ko, V. B. Snopkov. Opredelenie parametrov zashchishchennosti drevesiny v zavisimosti ot klassa uslovij sluzhby//Trudy BGTU (Minsk). Lesnaya i derevoobrabatyvayushchaya promyshlennost'. № 2. 2010. S. 134-137.
  13. Mezhgosudarstvennyj standart GOST 20022.2-2018. Zashchita drevesiny. Klassifikaciya. 2019. http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200159812.
  14. Fiches Produits Ouvrage Bois (P.O.B.). Traitement des bois. FCBA, IRABOIS, 2015.
  15. S. Martel, L. Casset, O. Gleizes. Forets et carbone: comprendre, agir, valoriser. Institut pour le developpement forestier, 2015.
  16. LOI n°2020-105 du 10 fйvrier 2020 relative а la lutte contre le gaspillage et а l'йconomie circulaire. Texte n°1, JORF n°0035 du 11 fйvrier 2020. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/eli/loi/2020/2/10/TREP1902395L/jo/texte.
  17. Mon atelier en ville. 2016. http://monatelierenville.com.
  18. Lesnoj plan Tomskoj oblasti (2009-2018), kniga 1. Departament lesnogo hozyajstva Tomskoj oblasti - OAO «Lesinvest».
  19. Programma razvitiya Lesopromyshlennogo klastera Tomskoj oblasti, T. 1. Departament razvitiya predprinimatel'stva i real'nogo sektora ekonomiki Tomskoj oblasti. Tomsk, 2017.
  20. R. B. Tabakaev, A. V. Kazakov, A. S. Zavori. Perspektivnost' nizkosortnyh topliv Tomskoj oblasti dlya teplotekhnologicheskogo ispol'zovaniya//Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. T. 323. № 4: Energetika. 2013. S. 41-46.
  21. A. P. Mohirev, M. A. Zyryanov. Tekhnologiya lesosechnyh rabot s sortirovkoj porubochnyh ostatkov drevesiny//Sistemy. Metody. Tekhnologii. Bratskij gosudarstvennyj universitet. № 3 (27). 2015. S. 118-122.
  22. I. R. SHegel'man, A. S. Vasil'ev. Analiz putej povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti energeticheskoj biomassy//Inzhenernyj vestnik Dona. № 3. 2013.
  23. Yu. V. Suhanov, Yu. Yu. Gerasimov, A. A. Seliverstov, A. P. Sokolov. Tekhnologicheskie cepochki i sistemy mashin dlya sbora i pererabotki drevesnoj biomassy v toplivnuyu shchepu pri sploshnolesosechnoj zagotovke v sortimentah//Sistemy. Metody. Tekhnologii. Bratskij gosudarstvennyj universitet (Bratsk). № 4 (12). 2011. S. 101-107.
  24. N. V. Pahomova, K. K. Rihter, M. A. Vetrova. Perekhod k cirkulyarnoj ekonomike i zamknutym cepyam postavok kak faktor ustojchivogo razvitiya//Vestnik SPbGU. Ekonomika. 2017. T. 33. Vyp. 2. S. 244-268.
  25. G. Moraga, S. Huysveld, F. Mathieux et al. Circular economy indicators: What do they measure?//Resources, Conservation and Recycling. Vol. 146. 2019. P. 452-461.
  26. Organizaciya Ob”edinyonnyh Nacij. Parizhskoe soglashenie v ramkah ramochnoj konvencii OON ob izmenenii klimata. Noyabr' 2015. United Nations Climate Change. https://unfccc.int/files/meetings/paris_nov_2015/application/pdf/paris_agreement_russian_.pdf.
  27. Pravitel'stvo Rossijskoj Federacii. Rasporyazhenie ot 25 dekabrya 2019 g. № 3183-r «Ob utverzhdenii prilagaemogo nacional'nogo plana meropriyatij pervogo etapa adaptacii k izmeneniyam klimata na period do 2022 g.». Moskva.
  28. Organizaciya Ob»edinyonnyh Nacij. Konvenciya o biologicheskom raznoobrazii. Desyatiletie bioraznoobraziya. ZHizn' v garmonii s prirodoj. Strategicheskij plan v oblasti sohraneniya i ustojchivogo ispol'zovaniya bioraznoobraziya na 2011-2020 gody.
  29. Ministerstvo prirodnyh resursov i ekologii Rossijskoj Federacii. Strategiya i Plan dejstvij po sohraneniyu biologicheskogo raznoobraziya Rossijskoj Federacii. WWF, GEF, UNEP. Moskva. 2014.
  30. T. S. Koroleva, A. V. Konstantinov, E. A. SHun'kina. Ugrozy i social'no-ekonomicheskie posledstviya izmeneniya klimata dlya lesnogo sektora//Trudy Sankt-Peterburgskogo nauchno-issledovatel'skogo instituta lesnogo hozyajstva. № 3. 2015. S. 55-71.
  31. Yu. E. Shelkunova. Balans ob”ektivnyh i sub”ektivnyh faktorov kak osnovopolagayushchij princip izmereniya ekonomicheskogo blagopoluchiya cheloveka//Ekonomika Rossii v XXI veke//Sbornik nauchnyh trudov XI Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, posvyashchennoj 110-letiyu ekonomicheskogo obrazovaniya. Tomskij Politekhnicheskij Universitet. 2014. S. 422-426.
  32. A. I. Gagarin, T. A. Lebedeva. Ocenka social'nyh funkcij lesnyh landshaftov Sibiri i Urala//Vestnik Sibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta geosistem i tekhnologij. № 1 (12). 2010. S. 161-173.
  33. https://russiaindustrialpark.ru/lesopromyshlennyy-park-asinovskiy.
  34. A. V. Kondratyuk. Metodicheskij podhod k formirovaniyu strategii ekonomicheskoj ustojchivosti holdingovyh sistem lesopromyshlennogo kompleksa//Vestnik moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta lesa. Lesnoj vestnik. № 5. 2008. S. 139-142.
  35. A. V. Kondratyuk. Osobennosti finansovoj strategii holdingovyh sistem//Vestnik rossijskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta im. G. V. Plekhanova (Moskva). № 6. 2007. S. 74-80.
  36. J. Lenglet, S. Caurla. Territorialisation et йcologisation dans la filiиre forкt-bois franзaise: une rencontre fortuite?//Dйveloppement durable et territories. Vol. 11, № 1. Avril 2020. 23 p.
  37. A. Niang, S. Bourdin, A. Torre. L’йconomie circulaire, quels enjeux de dйveloppement pour les territoires?//Dйveloppement durable et territories. Vol. 11. № 1. Avril 2020. 17 p.

Authors