Specific characteristics of institutes of social and innovative activity

This article identifies and substantiates such specific characteristics of the institutes of social and innovative activity as flexibility, inclusiveness, and hybridism. The relationship between the roles of economic agents and their needs is analyzed. The relationship between the participant's involvement in the project and the level of personal need, which he is satisfied with this project, is shown. The process of social innovations development is presented. It is shown that an inefficient institutional environment can lead to the closure of the project both at the stage of development of project documentation and at the stage of formation of the resource portfolio. It is justified that the flexibility of the institution is proportional to the cost of the coercion mechanism. An algorithm for designing institutes of social and innovative activity, which takes into account the needs of participants as an opportunity to expand the availability of resources, the features of institutions in this type of activity, and the specificity of the enforcement mechanism are proposed. The significance of the results is the possibility of their application in the design of the institutional environment of social and innovation activity at various levels of management

Keywords: institutions, needs, social and innovative activity, inclusiveness, flexibility, enforcement mechanism


  1. Bakalenko A.V. Evolution of the notion of crowdsourcing: the world and Russian experience. Proceedings of USUE [Izvestiya UrGEU], 2018, vol. 19, no.2. pp. 50-61. (in Russian)
  2. Ermokhin I. Levashenko A. Crowdfunding as an export strategy. Mezhdunarodnaja jekonomika [International Economics], 2018, no.5, pp. 8-15. (in Russian)
  3. Zaslavskaya T. Behavior of mass social groups as a factor of the transformation process. Monitoring obshhestvennogo mnenija: jekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny [Monitoring of public opinion: economic and social changes], 2000, no. 6 (50), pp. 14-19 (in Russian)
  4. Zaslavskaya T. On the subject-activity aspect of the transformation process (in Russian). Available at: http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/309/679/1219/001.ZASLAVSKAIA.pdf
  5. Ivanov V., Malinetskiy G. Digital Economy: Myths, Reality, Perspectives. Obshhestvenno-politicheskij zhurnal «Izborskij klub» [The socio-political magazine "Izborskiy Club"], 2017. no. 8 (54). (in Russian)
  6. Makarov V.L. Socialnyj klasterizm. Rossijskij vyzov [Social clusterism. The Russian Challenge] / M.: Business Atlas, 2010. - 272. p. (in Russian)
  7. Maslow A. Motivacija i lichnost' [Motivation and personality]. (in Russian) Available at: http://www.bim-bad.ru/docs/maslow_motivation_and_personality.pdf
  8. Melnikov AE Socially oriented clustering of the region's economy: features and principles Proceedings of USUE [Izvestiya UrGEU], 2018, vol.19, no.2. pp. 62-74. (in Russian)
  9. Popov E., Semyachkov K. Analysis of trends in the development of the digital economy. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravlenija [The International Journal Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Management ], 2017. no. 10., pp. 82-91. (in Russian)
  10. Tambovtsev V.L. Jekonomicheskaja teorija neformal'nyh institutov. [The economic theory of informal institutions], M.: RG-Prsss, 2014, — 174 p. (in Russian)
  11. Shabanova M. A. Ethical consumption in Russia: profiles, factors, development potential. Voprosy jekonomiki [Issues of economics], 2015, no. 5., pp. 79-103. (in Russian)
  12. Yunus M., Joly A. Sozdavaja mir bez bednosti: Social'nyj biznes i budushhee kapitalizma [Creating a world without poverty: Social business and the future of capitalism], Moscow: Alpina Publishers, 2009. (in Russian)
  13. Edwards-Schachter M.,Wallace M. Shaken, but not stirred’: Sixty years of defining social innovation// Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2017, no. 119, pp. 64–79
  14. Bolderdijk J., Brouwer C., Cornelissen G. When Do Morally Motivated Innovators Elicit Inspiration Instead of Irritation? // Front Psychol, 2018, Jan 12; no. 8: pp.23-62.
  15. Empowering people, driving change Social Innovation in the European Union. URL: ec.europa.eu/bepa/pdf/publications_pdf/social_innovation.pdf.
  16. Koch P., Hauknes J. On innovation in the public sector. PUBLIN Research Project, 2006. 85 p.
  17. Moore M.-L., Westley F.R. Public sector policy and strategies for facilitating social innovation / M.-L.Moore, F.R.Westley // Horizons: innovative communities, agents of change. 2001,  no. 11,  pp. 1-11.
  18. Mulgan, G. The Process of Social Innovation / G.Mulgan // Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 2006. vol.1, no. 2, pp. 145-162.
  19. New Frontiers in Social Innovation Research. ed. Nicholls, A., Simon, J., Gabriel, M., Whelan, C., Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2015.
  20. Phills J., Deiglmeier K., Miller D.T. Rediscovering social innovation / J.Phills, K.Deiglmeier, D.T.Miller // Stanford Social Innovation Review, 2008, no. 6, pp. 33–43.
  21. Popov E., Stoffers J., Omonov Z., Veretennikova A. Analysis of civic initiatives: Multiparameter classification of social innovations // American Journal of Applied Sciences, 2016, no. 13(11), pp. 1136-1148
  22. Schwartz S. H. A Theory of Cultural Value Orientations: Explication and Applications. Comparative Sociology , 2006, no. 5(2–3), pp. 137–182.
  23. Szijarto B., Milley P., Svensson K., Cousins J. On the evaluation of social innovations and social enterprises: Recognizing and integrating two solitudes in the empirical knowledge base // Evaluation and Program Planning, 2018, vol.66, February, pp. 20-32.
  24. Young D. R., Lecy J. D. Defining the Universe of Social Enterprise: Competing Metaphors. Voluntas, 2014, no. 25(5), pp. 1307–1332. (DOI: 10.1007/s11266-013-9396-z)