The application of the shared governance approach in Russian universities: the formulation of the problem and the direction of improvement
In the article the authors considered the decision-making system in the entrepreneurial university governance structure, implemented on the basis of the shared governance system. It is demonstrated that the shared governance approach allows the transition to a model of competitive management in the universities, characterized by the professionalization of administrative staff, and simultaneously saves the academic nature of the institution of higher education. Authors formulate a number of recommendations concerning implementation of the shared governance approach within the Russian higher education system, based on the analysis of foreign and domestic experience in the development of the institution of entrepreneurial universities
Keywords: knowledge economy, entrepreneurial university, shared governance approach, the project «5-100»
References
1. О. В. Бычкова. Участие в управлении университетом: научное издание. СПб.: Норма, 2016. – 120 с.
2. О. В. Бычкова. Что такое shared governance?//Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 2016. № 105 (5). С. 110-121.
3. Е. Б. Кузнецов, А. А. Энговатова. «Университеты 4.0»: точки роста экономики знаний в России//Инновации. 2016. № 5 (211). С. 3-9.
4. П. Маассен. Парадокс в управлении университетом/Под ред. Д. В. Козлова, Н. Г. Малошонок//Современный университет между глобальными вызовами и локальными задачами. VII Международная конференция Российской ассоциации исследователей высшего образования сб. материалов; Нац. исслед. ун-т «Высшая школа экономики», Ин-т образования. М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2016. С. 30-40.
5. Г. Розовски. Университет. Руководство для владельца. М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2015. –328 с.
6. R. Alfred. Shared Governance in Community Colleges. Education Commission of the States. 1998. P. 2-9.
7. A. Amaral, A. Magalh es. The Emergent Role of External Stakeholders in European Higher Education Governance/in A. Amaral, G. A Jones, B. Karseth (eds.) op. cit., 2002. P. 1-21.
8. M. Ben-Ruwin. The Corporatization of Shared Governance: The Corporate Challenge and the Academic Response. AAUP Shared Governance Conference and Workshops. 2010. P. 16.
9. B. R. Clark. The organizational saga in higher education// Administrative sci. quart. 1972. Vol. 17. No. 2. P. 178-184.
10. J. A. Douglass. Shared governance at the University of California. Research and Occasional Paper Series. 1998. P. 12.
11. H. Etzkowitz, A. Webster, C. Gebhardt, B. R. Cantisano Terra. The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm//Research Policy. 2000. Vol. 29. No. 2. P. 313-330.
12. Shared governance in colleges and universities: A statement by the Higher Education Program and Policy Council. AFT Higher Education. 2011. P. 11.
13. S. Kater, J. Levin. Shared Governance in the Community College. The University of Arizona. 2003. P. 37.
14. S. Lapworth. Arresting Decline in Shared Governance: Towards a Flexible Model for Academic Participation//Higher Education Quarterly. 2004. Vol. 58. No. 4. P. 299-314.
15. R. Middlehurst. Leadership Roles and Management Structures in UK Universities//Higher Education Quarterly. 2004. Vol. 58. No. 4. P. 258-279.
16. Poh-Kam Wong, Yuen-Ping Ho, Annette Singh. Towards an «Entrepreneurial University» Model to Support Knowledge-Based Economic Development: The Case of the National University of Singapore//World Development. 2007. Vol. 35. No. 6. P. 941-958.
17. Stanford University. http://www.stanford.edu.
18. University of California, Berkeley. http://www.berkeley.edu.
19. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. http://www.unc.edu.
20. http://www.uva.nl/en.
