The purpose of the article is to identify the features of the socio-economic development of the science cities of the Moscow region as places to live
and work in comparison with other municipalities of the region. It is shown that for science cities, as well as for other municipalities of the Moscow region,
the location in relation to Moscow and the convenience of transport links with it are of the utmost importance. The distinguishing feature of science cities
continues to be the increased level of education of the population, including secondary vocational education, while the level and trends of the socio-economic
development dynamics, the structure of the economy of the science cities of the Moscow region differ markedly from each other. The reasonability of the
requirements formulated in federal legislation for obtaining and maintaining the status of a science city, which may even restrain their development, is
questioned. It is proposed not to limit the support of established scientific-industrial complexes exclusively within the boundaries of municipalities. Using
the example of science cities, the importance of the problem of the correct distribution of tax revenues between the budgets of territories is also shown.
Keywords: science cities, municipalities, population, level of education, employment, income of the population, pendulum migrations, data from mobile operators, quality of the urban environment.
References
- G. M. Lappo, P. M. Polian. Science towns in Russia: the forbidden cities of yesterday — the drivers of growth for today//Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology. 2008. № 1. P. 20-49.
- A. A. Aguirrechu. Naukogrady Rossii: Istoriya Formirovaniya i Razvitiya [Science cities of Russia: the history of creation and development]. Moscow, 2009. 192 p.
- V. V. Ivanov, B. I. Matirko. Naukogrady Rossii: ot Metodologii k Praktike [Science cities of Russia: from methodology to practice]. Moscow, 2001. 142 p.
- E. V. Akinfeeva, The role of science cities in the development of the national innovation system in Russia//Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2015. Vol. 26. № 1. P. 91-99.
- H. Schweiger, A. Stepanov, P. Zacchia. The long-run effects of R&D place-based policies: evidence from Russian science cities//EBRD Working Paper № 216. 2018. 11 p. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3227009.
- Science cities of Russa//Naukograd: science, production, society. 2018. № 1. P. 5-31.
- N. M. Emelin. Monitoring and improvement of performance indicators of science cities//Information and Innovations. 2023. Vol. 18. № 4. P. 38-46. doi: 10.31432/1994-2443-2023-18-4-38-46.
- E. V. Mityakova, O. I. Mityakova. Comprehensive assessment of the dynamics of the development of science cities in Russia//Innovative Development of Economy. 2022. № 5. P. 43-51. doi: 10.51832/22237984_2022_5_43.
- A. A. Mal'tseva, I. A. Monakhov, N. E. Barsukova, I. N. Veselov. Science cities of Russia and the United Kingdom: «cui bono»?//Innovations. 2016. № 7. P. 40-49.
- E. S. Safronova. Domestic and foreign models of science cities development//Issues of Regional Economy. 2020. № 3. P. 96-102.
- D. Yu. Faykov, D. Yu. Baydarov. Cities of science: foreign and Russian experience for new Russian megaprojects//Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. 2021. Vol. 11. № 4. P. 1735-1754. doi: 10.18334/vinec. 11.4.113905.
- A.-V. Anttiroiko. Science cities: their characteristics and future challenges//International Journal of Technology Management. 2004. Vol. 28. № 3-6. P. 395-418.
- C. Garner. Viewpoint: Science Cities: refreshing the concept for 21st-century places//Town Planning Review. 2006. Vol. 77. № 5. P. i-vi. doi: 10.3828/tpr.77.5.1.
- E. B. Lenchuk. Formation of innovative infrastructure in the Russian regions//The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2013. № 5. P. 76-91.
- Yu. S. Vasileva. Research of Central federal district innovation infrastructure of Russia//Innovations. 2021. № 2. P. 83-92. doi: 10.26310/2071-3010.2021.268.2.012.
- A. B. Gusev. Science cities: forgotten issue or revival?//Nauka. Innovacii. Obrazovanie. 2015. Vol. 10. № 2. P. 42-60.
- I. E. Trebushkova. Geographical analysis of the state policy of Russian science cities//Uchenye zapiski krymskogo federal'nogo universiteta im. V. I. Vernadskogo. Geografiya. Geologiya. 2022. Vol. 8. № 1. P. 20-35.
- Е. D. Volodina, O. N. Gutsyniuk, О. D. Poleshchuk et al. Problems of implementation of the state scientific and technical policy to support science cities and territories with a high concentration of scientific and technological potential//Information and Innovations. 2023. Vol. 18. № 3. P. 50-68. doi:10.31432/1994-2443-2023-18-3-50-68.
- O. V. Kuznetsova. Scientific and technological priorities in the federal spatial development policy in Russia//Federalism. 2022. Vol. 27. № 4. P. 5-20. doi: 10.21686/2073-1051-2022-4-5-20.
- Ye. Lukash, R. Musaev, E. Bukharova. Econometric estimation of the impact of s pecial economic zones on spatial development//Problemy Teorii i Praktiki Upravleniya. 2017.№ 6. P. 51-65.
- M. V. Ignateva, Ya. V. Shokin. Assessment of the impact of the special economic zone on the urban environment//RISK: Resources, Information, Supply, Competition. 2020. № 3. P. 56-62.
- S. V. Kabyshev. Science cities of the Russian Federation in the mechanism of implementation of the national scientific and technological policy: constitutional and legal Aspects//Journal of Russian Law. 2023. Vol. 27. № 9. P. 15-27. doi: 10.61205/jrp.2023.100.
- S. B. Nanba, A. E. Pomazansky. Legal support for the unity of local self-government and science city: from territoriality to integrity//Lomonosov Law Journal. 2024. № 1. P. 146-158. doi: 10.55959/MSU0130-0113-11-65-1-9.
- A. V. Voropaeva, L. Yu. Korosteleva. Russian Science Cities and Urban Environment Problems//Theory and Practice of Social Development. 2023. № 12. P. 80-90. doi: 10.24158/tipor.2023.12.8.
- A. V. Voropaeva, L. Yu. Korosteleva. On the issue of the infrastructure of science cities//Problems of Territory’s Development. 2024. Vol. 28. № 3. P. 82-96.doi: 10.15838/ptd.2024.3.131.6.
- A. G. Makhrova, R. A. Babkin. Analysis of Moscow agglomeration settlement system pulsations based mobile operators data//Regional'nye Issledovaniya. 2018. № 2. P. 68-78.
- A. G.. Makhrova, R. A. Babkin, P. L. Kirillov. Spatiotemporal commuting patterns in Moscow region//Journal of the New Economic Association. 2024. № 2. P. 249-256. doi: 10.31737/22212264_2024_2_249-256.
- Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation of 19.06.2024 № 821 «On assigning the status of a science city of the Russian Federation to the urban district of Serpukhov, Moscow Region».
- Law of the Moscow Region dated 30.01.2023 № 1/2023-OZ «On the transformation of the urban district of Protvino of the Moscow Region, the urban district of Pushchino of the Moscow Region and the urban district of Serpukhov of the Moscow Region, on the status and establishment of the border of the newly formed municipality».
- Certificate on the results of the analysis of the compliance of the indicators of scientific and production complexes of science cities of the Russian Federation with therequirements established by paragraph 8 of Article 2.1 of Federal Law № 70-FZ «On the Status of a Science City of the Russian Federation» and the achievement of the results provided for in the action plans for the implementation of strategies for the socio-economic development of science cities of the Russian Federation in 2022. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, September 22, 2023. https://minobrnauki.gov.ru/documents/?ELEMENT_ID=73336.
- https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/Urov-14a_2010-2022.xlsx.
- https://rosstat.gov.ru/dbscripts/munst/munst46/DBInet.cgi.
- https://77.rosstat.gov.ru/folder/210976.
- https://www.nalog.gov.ru/html/sites/www.rn50.nalog.ru/otchetu/7_ndfl_2023.zip.
- https://индекс-городов.рф/#.
- https://logistic-avto.ru/articles/rasstoyanie-ot-moskvy-do-gorodov-moskovskoy-oblasti.
Authors