The article opens a series of works aimed at improving the tools for analyzing and evaluating innovation activities in the regions of Russia. The article
discusses one of the possible tools — the index method. The analysis uses information from the official website of Rosstat for 8 federal districts and 82
regions of the Russian Federation. The research uses the algorithm of the index method, which includes preparation of information, reduction of indicators to a
dimensionless form, comparative and dynamic analysis of transformed indicators, calculation of generalized indices, comparative analysis of regions, analysis of
statistical characteristics of the generalized index, and comparative analysis of federal districts. The data of the comparative analysis of the country's regions
according to the normalized indicators are shown using petal diagrams. The dynamics of indicators of innovative development for individual subjects of the
Russian Federation emphasizes the peculiarities of the regions. A comparative analysis of the generalized indices of Russian regions showed a general low
level of innovative development of the country's regions. The dynamics of the statistical characteristics of the generalized index of innovative development
showed that the average value of the generalized index for the total of the subjects of the Russian Federation is quite stable, while the differentiation of
regions is clearly expressed, measured by the decile coefficient. A comparative analysis of the federal districts also revealed a strong differentiation in the
levels of their innovative development
Keywords: innovation activity, region, index method, ranking of indicators, threshold values, comparative analysis
References
- R. S. Kaplan, D. P. Norton. Cbalansirovannaya sistema pokazateley. Ot strategii k deystviyu/Per. s angl. M.: ZAO «Olimp-Biznes», 2003. 304 s.
- R. S. Kaplan, D. P. Norton. Organizatsiya, oriyentirovannaya na strategiyu/Per. s angl. M.: ZAO «Olimp-Biznes», 2003. 416 s.
- O. I. Mityakova. Problemy ustoychivogo razvitiya Rossii na osnove in-novatsionnykh preobrazovaniy. N. Novgorod: Nizhegorod. gos. tekhn. un-t, 2009. 237 s.
- Yu. M. Maksimov, S. N. Mityakov, Ye. S. Mityakov. Sistema pokazateley ustoychivogo razvitiya regiona//Ekonomika regiona. 2011. № 2 (26). S. 226-231.
- V. K. Senchagov, S. N. Mityakov. Ispol'zovaniye indeksnogo metoda dlya otsenki urovnya ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti//Vestnik akademii ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti MVD Rossii. 2011. № 5. S. 41-50.
- Ye. S. Mityakov, S. N. Mityakov. Sravnitel'nyy analiz podkhodov k vychisleniyu obob-shchennogo indeksa ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti Rossii//Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2014. № 3. S. 307.
- N. V. Tseykovets. Indeksnyye metody integral'noy otsenki urovnya natsio-nal'noy ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti//Problemy sovremennoy ekonomiki. 2015. №4. S. 106-109.
- V. V. Karpov, K. K. Loginov, A. Yu. Lagzdin. Analiz ekonomicheskom bezopasnosti regiona na primere Omskoy oblasti//Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya «Ekonomika». 2016. № 4. S. 170-180.
- S. V. Kazantsev. Metodika i instrumentariy otsenki bezopasnosti na natsional'nom i regional'nom urovnyakh//Mir novoy ekonomiki. 2017. № 2. S. 6-12.
- T. Yu. Krotenko. Metodicheskiye podkhody k razrabotke indikatorov eko-nomicheskoy bezopasnosti organizatsii//Vestnik universiteta. 2018. № 11. S. 18-22.
- K. Yu. Voloshenko, Ye. V. Voloshenko. Tipologiya regionov zapadnogo porubezh'ya Rossii po urovnyu ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti: riski i ugrozy//Regional'nyye issledovaniya. 2019. № 4. S. 20-33.
- Ye. G. Tokmakova, D. V. Karimova, A. A. Valyanova. Otsenka ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti regiona s prime-neniyem indikativnykh metodov na primere tyumenskoy oblasti (bez okrugov)//Innovatsionnoye razvitiye ekonomiki. 2020. № 4-5. S. 294-306.
Authors