Innovative projects management in electric grid companies: the theoretical aspects
This article describes the transition conditions for power systems towards the use of distributed energy resources as well as the main development trends of Smart Grid cluster (intelligent power supply networks) and related innovative technologies. The implementation of Smart Grid projects is also considered from the perspective of eco-innovation: direct and indirect effects have been allocated, the problem of internalization of possible dual externalities has been described. Smart Grid have been analyzed from the theory of collective action perspective by the example of a pool of large-scale innovative projects of the largest network operator in the Netherlands called Alliander. The authors also mentioned the need to move from a transactional model of interaction among electric grid companies with suppliers to a model based on cooperation. Summing up, the authors highlighted features of innovative projects on Smart Grid implementation, as well as provided additional parameters, on which the assessment of innovative projects effectiveness in the electricity sector can be conducted
Keywords: innovative projects, eco-innovation, intelligent network, dual externalities, the theory of collective action
References
1. Основные результаты функционирования объектов электроэнергетики в 2015 г./Под ред. А. В. Черезова. 2016. – 72 с.
2. Н. Н. Швец, Г. В. Колесник. Локализация производства электротехнического оборудования как фактор обеспечения энергетической безопасности государства в условиях глобального рынка//Национальные интересы: приоритеты и безопасность, 2014. № 16. С. 37-45.
3. A. Moreno-Munoz, J. Gonzбlez de la Rosa, J. Flores-Arias, F. Bellido-Outerino, F. Gilde-Castro. Energy efficiency criteria in uninterruptible power supply selection//Applied Energy, 2001. V. 88. P. 1312-1321.
4. M. Pipattanasomporn, M. Willingham, S. Rahman. Implications of on-site distributed generation for commercial/industrial facilities //IEEE Trans Power Systems, 2005. V. 20. P. 206-212.
5. С. В. Ратнер. Управление качеством энергоснабжения в энергосистемах со смешанным типом генерации: организационно-экономические аспекты//Финансовая аналитика: проблемы и решения. 2016. № 19. С. 2-6.
6. European Commission, 2011. Mandate M/490, March 2011.
7. M. Reuver, T. Lei, Z. Lukszo. How should grid operators govern smart grid innovation projects? An embedded case study approach//Energy Policy, 2016. № 97. P. 628-635.
8. К. Г. Гомонов. Перспективы и экономическая эффективность внедрения интеллектуальных энергосетей в России и в мире//Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: «Экономика». 2015. № 2. С. 25-35.
9. G. Scherhorn, L. Reisch, S. Schroedl. Wege zu nachhaltigen Konsummustern. Ueberblick ueber den Stand der Forschung und vorrangige Forschungsthemen. Metropolis-Verlag, Marburg, 1997.
10. Н. А. Алмастян. Системы экологического менеджмента как организационные экоинновации//Друкеровский вестник. 2017. № 1. С. 15-28.
11. M. Andersen, 2002. Organising Interfirm Learning: as the Market Begins to Turn Green. Partnersh. Leadersh. Build. Alliances a Sustain. Futur. Vol. 8. P. 103-119.
12. J. Carrillo-Hermosilla, P. del Rнo, T. Kцnnцlд, 2010. Diversity of ecoinnovations: reflections from selected case studies//J. Clean. Prod. 18, 1073-1083.
13. J. Horbach, 2008. Determinants of environmental innovation — new evidence from German panel data sources//Res. Policy 37, 163-173.
14. J. Horbach, C. Rammerb, K. Rennings, 2012. Determinants of ecoinnovations by type of environmental impact — the role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull//Ecol. Econ. 78, 112-122.
15. M. Tracey, R. Neuhaus, 2013. Purchasing's role in global new product process development projects//J. Purch. Supply Manag. 19 (2), 98-105.
16. EIO, 2011. Eco-Innovation Challenge: Pathways to a Resource Efficient Europe. Eco-Innovation Observatory, European Commission.
17. R. G. Cooper, 1988. Predevelopment activities determine new product success//Ind. Mark. Manag. 17 (3), 237-247.
18. R. G. Cooper, 2008. Perspective: the stage-gate idea-to-launch process. Update, what's new, and Nextgen systems//J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 25 (3), 213-232.
19. M. Huesemann, 2003. The limits of technological solutions to sustainable development//Clean Techn. Environ. Policy 5, 21- 34.
20. J. P. O'Brien, 2003. The capital structure implications of pursuing a strategy of innovation//Strateg. Manag. J. 24, 415-431.
21. E. Ciccozzi, R. Checkenya, A. V. Rodriguez, 2003. Recent experiences and challenges in promoting cleaner production investments in developing countries//J. Clean. Prod. 11, 629-638.
22. А. А. Сальникова. Методы учета социальных и экологических эффектов в проектах возобновляемой энергетики//Друкеровский вестник, 2017. № 1. С. 30-37.
23. B. Uzzi, 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness//Adm. Sci. Q 42, 35-67.
24. M. Olson, 1971. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Revised edition., Harward University Press, Massachusett.
25. P. Oliver, 1980. Rewards and punishments as selective incentives for collective action: theoretical investigations//Am. J. Sociol. 85, 1356-1375.
26. D. Knoke, 1988. Incentives in collective action organizations//Am. Sociol. Rev. 53 (3), 311-329.
27. P. B. Clark, J. Q. Wilson, 1961. Incentive systems: a theory of organizations//Adm.Sci. Q 6, 129-166.
28. R. H. Salisbury, 1969. An exchange theory of interest groups// Midwest J. Polit. Sci. 13, 1-32.
29. CEER, 2012. 5th CEER Benchmarking Report on the Quality of Electricity Supply 2011. CEER, Brussels.
30. http://www.epri.com.
