The work revealed the positive impact of the regional institute of business incubation of innovative projects on the creation of new innovative products. At the same time, to a greater extent, the level of novelty of the products concerns the product novelty for the innovative companies themselves, and not the home region, country or international markets. All this sharply limits the added value of a regional business incubation institute for the development of a regional and national innovation system. The paper shows the features of the creation and development of objects of intellectual activity in a catch-up economy, to which the Russian economy is directly related. It is shown that one of the main problems and at the same time the reasons for this state of affairs is a strong dividing line between science and domestic business in a catch-up economy. Therefore, a shift in the paradigm of the national economy of the catching-up type to the paradigm of a stable economy seems to be strategically justified and toppriority
Keywords: business incubator, innovation project, venture capital investment, technology entrepreneur, transaction costs, innovation subjects, regional innovation system, catch-up economy
References
- Tsiteladze DD 2011. Methodology of creating a self-organized Russian innovation business ecosystem // Innovations magazine. No. 6. (152): 9-18
- Mian, S.A. 2011, “What is the theory of technology incubation?” International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management; 13 (2): 113-121
- Abetti, P.A. 2004. Government supported incubators in the Helsinki region, Finland: Infrastructure, results, and best practices. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29 (1): 19-40.
- Lalkaka, R. and Shaffer, D. 1999. "Nurturing Entrepreneurs, creating business technology incubation in Brazil." Business Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
- Colombo, M.G. and Delmastro, M. 2002, “How effective are technology incubators ?: Evidence from Italy”, Research Policy, Vol. 31 No. 7: 1103–1122.
- Willams, D., Tsiteladze D. 2016. Assessing the Value, Incubation, Imperial Collage Press: 151-178
- Allen, D.N. and Rahman, S. 1985. Small business incubators: a positive environment for entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management (pre-1986), 23 (000003): 12
- Smilor, R. and Gill, M.1986. The New Business Incubator. Linking Talent, Technology and Know-How. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
- Campbell, C., Berge, D., Janus, J., and Olsen, R.1988. Change Agents in the New Economy: Business Incubators Economic Development. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
- Allen, D. and McCluskey, R. 1990. In the business incubator industry. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15 (2): 61-77.
- Tsiteladze, D.D. 2012. Ways of solving problems of financing innovative projects of early stages in Russia // Innovations. 01 (159): 15-22
- Hackett, S.M. and Dilts, D.M. 2004a. A real option-driven theory of business incubation. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29 (1): 41-54
- Mian, S.A. 1991, “doctoral dissertation.” The George Washington University, Washington, DC.
- Mian, S.A. 1997, “Assessing and managing the technology business incubator: an integrative framework”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 12: 251–285.
- Tornatzky, I., Batts, Y., McCrea, N., Lewis, M., and Quittman, I. 1996. Best practices, strategies and tools from 50 programs. NBIA, Athens, OH.
- Autio, E. and Klofsten, M. 1998. A comparative study of two European business incubators. Journal of Small Business Management, 36: 30-43
- Sherman, H. and Chappell, D. 1998. Methodological challenges in evaluating businesses incubator outcomes. Economic Development Quarterly, 12 (4): 313-321.
- Feldman M.P. et Audretsch D.B. 1999. Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition, European Economic Review, Vol. 43, n 2: 409-429
- Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D. & Santoro, M.D. 2004. Developing and managing strategic alliances, building social capital, and creating value. In Ghobadian, A., O'Regan, N., Gallear, D and Viney, H. (eds.), Achieving Competitive Advantage in the Global Market Place: 13-34, Palgrave-Macmillan Publishing, London, UK
- Philip Cooke and Kevin Morgan. 1998: The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions and Innovation, Oxford University Press.
- Boschma, R. A. 2005. “Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment”, Regional Studies, vol. 39, no. 1: 61-74
- Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D. & Santoro, M.D. 2004. Developing and managing strategic alliances, building social capital, and creating value. In Ghobadian, A., O'Regan, N., Gallear, D and Viney, H. (eds.), Achieving Competitive Advantage in the Global Market Place: 13-34, Palgrave-Macmillan Publishing, London, UK
- Phan, P.H., 2016. Technology entrepreneurship and business incubation: theory, practice, lessons learned. Description: New Jersey: Imperial College Press
- Tsiteladze D.D. 2014. Classification and evaluation of transaction costs for the technology business // Innovations. (194), December: 93-98
- Philip Cooke and Kevin Morgan. 1998: The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions and Innovation, Oxford University Press.
- Dementiev V.E. 2006. Overtaking Post-Industrialization "and Industrial Policy / Preprint # WP / 2006/199 - Moscow: CEMI RAS
- Tsiteladze, DD 2018. The development of mechanisms of innovation processes in regional innovation systems of the catch-up economy // “Innovations”. 6 (236): 26-37
- Rogova, E. M., Tkachenko, E. A., and Fiyaksel, E. A. 2011. Venture Management. - M.: HSE Publishing House
- Shadiyeva D. 2016. Analysis of global trends in financing innovation activities // World and National Economy,
- Kurakova N.G., Tsvetkova L.A., Zinov V.G. 2016. Patent landscape of the Russian Federation, created by residents of the country: analysis of the problems identified // Economics of Science, Vol. 2, No. 1: 64-79
- Phan, P.H., Siegel, D.S., Wright M. 2005 Science parks and incubators: Observations, synthesis and future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 20 (2): 165-182.
- Aerts, K., Matthyssens, P. And Vandenbempt, K. 2007. Critical role and screening practices of European business incubations. Technovation. 27 (5): 254-267.
- Phillips, R.G., 2002. Technology? Technology in Society, 24 (3): 299-316.
- Yunhao Zhu, 2016. China’s Inter-Incubator Relationships and Business Venture
- Hu, A. 2007. Technology parks and regional economic growth. Research Policy, 36 (1): 76-87.
- Albuquerque, L.C. de. 2004. “Agradecimento”. XIV Seminario Nacional de Parques Tecnologicos e Incubadoras de Empresas. ANPROTEC, Porto de Galinhas, 11 November.
- Garcia, F.P. et al., 2015. Reference Center for Business Incubation: A proposal for a new model of operation. Available at: www.anprotec.org.br/Relata/artigoCernNBIA.pdf .Accessed on January 2016.
- Buev V. 2012. Business Incubators: What is their performance? // "Business Journal", №1: 10 - 11.
- Rogova E.M. 2013. The efficiency of the business incubators as an element of the spin-off strategy of universities // Innovations № 10 (180): 41 - 46.
- Kostyunina, G.M., Baronov, V.I. 2012. Technological parks in foreign and Russian practice // Bulletin of MGIMO-University. No. 3: 91-99
- URL: http://www.oneup.ru/analytics/innomap
- Federal portal of small and medium enterprises. URL: http://smb.gov.ru/statistics/navy/report/ (appeal date 02/20/2014).
- The site of the Ministry of Communications and Mass Communications. URL: http://minsvyaz.ru/ru/ (a address of February 25, 2014).
- Report of the Ministry of Communications and Mass Media of Russia for 2008-2011. Systematic Requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. URL: http://minsvyaz.ru/common/upload/publication/God_Otch_2012.pdf (appeal date 21. 03.2014).
- China Torch Statistical Yearbooks ’ https://www.chinayearbooks.com/
- NBIA www.nbia.org
- Science & Engineering Indicators. 2016. National Science Board, National Science Foundation. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2016/nsb20161/uploads/1/nsb20161.pdf
Authors