Исследование форм взаимодействия университетов и многонациональных корпораций в сфере информационных технологий в России

В данной статье анализируются преимущества и формы сотрудничества между университетами и промышленностью, а также обсуждается роль академического участия в многонациональных корпорациях (МНК) в связи с решением об интернационализации НИОКР в принимающих странах. Различные случаи академического участия рассматриваются на примерах российской ИТ-индустрии, предлагается классификация моделей сотрудничества, целью которой является разъяснение и упрощение принятия управленческих решений в отношении выбора подходящей формы сотрудничества между университетами и промышленностью. В исследовании используются как вторичные, так и первичные источники информации. В первой части исследования были проведены углубленные интервью среди менеджеров программ академического взаимодействия МНК, работающих в ИТ-индустрии и российских университетах. Вторичные данные используются для выявления и анализа существующих практик в соответствии с предлагаемой категоризацией форм сотрудничества между университетом и промышленностью. Кроме того, приводится успешный пример академического участия Dell EMC в России, отражающий направления будущих исследований, а также подтверждающий предлагаемую авторами категоризацию. В результате анализа, преимущества взаимодействия между наукой и бизнесом (академического участия в деятельности МНК) были сопоставлены с трудностями, с которыми сталкиваются МНК при разработке своих стратегий НИОКР, и был рассмотрен вопрос о локализации и интернационализации. В статье сформулирована классификация моделей сотрудничества между университетом и промышленностью, поскольку были определены и описаны формы таких партнерских отношений. Исследование раскрывает важные проблемы для МНК в очень специфическом и мало изученном аспекте, касающемся взаимодействия между университетами и промышленностью. Результаты работы могут быть использованы как другими исследователями, так и специалистами-практиками, которые интересуются российским рынком или выбирают между различными формами сотрудничества с университетами NB: текст статьи представлен на английском языке!!

Ключевые слова: сотрудничество между университетами и отраслями, МНК (многонациональные корпорации), академическое участие, стратегии в сфере НИОКР (исследования и разработки)

Список использованных источников

1. E. Mansfield (1995). Academic research underlying industrial innovations: sources characteristics and financing//The review of Economics and Statistics. P. 55-65.

2. M. Beise, H. Stahl (1999). Public research and industrial innovations in Germany//Research policy. Vol. 28. No. 4. P. 397-422.

3. W. M. Cohen, R. R. Nelson, J. P. Walsh (2002). Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D//Management science. Vol. 48. No. 1. P. 1-23.

4. A. Geuna, A. Muscio (2009). The governance of university knowledge transfer: A critical review of the literature//Minerva. Vol. 47. No. 1. P. 93-114.

5. I. Ramos-Vielba, M. Fernández-Esquinas (2012). Beneath the tip of the iceberg: Exploring the multiple forms of university–industry linkages//Higher Education. Vol. 64. No. 2. P. 237-265.

6. K. Pavitt (2001). Public policies to support basic research: What can the rest of the world learn from US theory and practice? And what they should not learn//Industrial and corporate change. Vol. 10. No. 3. P. 761-779.

7. P. Mueller (2006). Exploring the knowledge filter: How entrepreneurship and university–industry relationships drive economic growth//Research policy. Vol. 35. No. 10. P. 1499-1508.

8. M. Perkmann, V. Tartari, M. McKelvey, E. Autio, A. Broström, P. D’Este, R. Fini, A. Geuna, R. Grimaldi, A. Hughes, S. Krabel (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations//Research Policy. Vol. 42. No. 2. P. 423-442.

9. J. W. Spencer (2001). How relevant is university-based scientific research to private high-technology firms? A United States–Japan comparison//Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 44. No. 2. P. 432-440.

10. K. Laursen, A. Salter (2004). Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation?//Research policy. Vol. 33. No. 8. P. 1201-1215.

11. L. Bstieler, M. Hemmert, G. Barczak (2015). Trust Formation in University–Industry Collaborations in the US Biotechnology Industry: IP Policies Shared Governance and Champions//Journal of Product Innovation Management. Vol. 32. No. 1. P. 111-121.

12. A. Arundel, A. Geuna (2004). Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms//Economics of Innovation and new Technology. Vol. 13. No. 6. P. 559-580.

13. J. H. Eun, K. Lee, G. Wu (2006). Explaining the «University-run enterprises» in China: A theoretical framework for university– industry relationship in developing countries and its application to China//Research Policy. Vol. 35. No. 9. P. 1329-1346.

14. T. Schofield (2013). Critical success factors for knowledge transfer collaborations between university and industry//Journal of Research Administration. Vol. 44. No. 2 P. 38.

15. S. M. Puffer, D. J. McCarthy, A. M. Jaeger (2016). Institution building and institutional voids: Can Poland’s experience inform Russia and Brazil?//International Journal of Emerging Markets. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 18-41.

16. A. M. Attia (2015). National innovation systems in developing countries: Barriers to university–industry collaboration in Egypt International//Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development. Vol. 14. No. 2. P. 113-124.

17. L. Bstieler, M. Hemmert, G. Barczak (2015). Trust Formation in University–Industry Collaborations in the US Biotechnology Industry: IP Policies Shared Governance and Champions//Journal of Product Innovation Management. Vol. 32. No. 1. P. 111-121.

18. W. M. Cohen, S. Klepper (1996). A reprise of size and R&D//The Economic Journal. P. 925-951.

19. A. Y. Lewin, S. Massini, C. Peeters (2009). Why are companies offshoring innovation? The emerging global race for talent//Journal of International Business Studies. P. 901-925.

20. J. G. Thursby, M. C. Thursby (2006). Here or There? a survey of factors in multinational R&D location: report to the Government/ University/Industry research roundtable A Survey of Factors in Multinational R&D Location: Report to the Government/University/Industry Research Roundtable (December 1 2006). Kauffman Foundation Large Research Projects Research.

21. P. Maskell, A. Malmberg (1999). Localised learning and industrial competitiveness//Cambridge journal of economics. Vol. 23. No. 2. P. 167-185.

22. M. I. Kafouros, N. Forsans (2012). The role of open innovation in emerging economies: Do companies profit from the scientific knowledge of others?//Journal of World Business. Vol. 47. No. 3. P. 362-370.

23. E. Rugraff, M. W. Hansen (2011). Multinational corporations and local firms in emerging economies. Amsterdam University Press.

24. F. Ciabuschi, H. Dellestrand, U. Holm (2012). The role of headquarters in the contemporary MNC//Journal of International Management. Vol. 18. No. 3. P. 213-223.

25. D. R. GnyawalỊ, M. Singal, S. C. Mu (2009). Knowledge Ties Among Subsidiaries In Mncs: A Multi-Level Conceptual Model. Journal Of International Management, 15, 387-400.

26. Z. Najafi-Tavani, A. Giroud, U. Andersson (2014). The interplay of networking activities and internal knowledge actions for subsidiary influence within MNCs//Journal of World Business. Vol. 49. No. 1. P. 122-131.

27. T. C. Ambos, B. Ambos, B. B. Schlegelmilch (2006). Learning from foreign subsidiaries: An empirical investigation of headquarters' benefits from reverse knowledge transfers//International Business Review. Vol. 15. No. 3. P. 294-312.

28. R. Florida, C. Mellander, K. Stolarick (2011). Creativity and prosperity: The Global Creativity Index.

29. R. Veugelers, B. Cassiman (2005). R&D cooperation between firms and universities. Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing//International Journal of Industrial Organization. Vol. 23. No. 5. P. 355-379.

30. B. Y. Eom, K. Lee (2010). Determinants of industry–academy linkages and their impact on firm performance: The case of Korea as a latecomer in knowledge industrialization//Research Policy. Vol. 39. No. 5. P. 625-639.

31. A. Cosh, A. Hughes (2010). Never mind the quality feel the width: University–industry links and government financial support for innovation in small high-technology businesses in the UK and the USA//The Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 35. No. 1. P. 66-91.

32. D. Schartinger, C. Rammer, M. M. Fischer, J. Fröhlich (2002). Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants//Research policy. Vol. 31. No. 3. P. 303-328.

33. J. Howells, R. Ramlogan, S. L. Cheng (2012). Innovation and university collaboration: paradox and complexity within the knowledge economy Cambridge//Journal of Economics. Vol. 36. No. 3. P. 703-721.

34. http://www.spbstu.ru/international-cooperation/internationalactivities/the-isec/ise-centers.

35. D. Hedge, D. Hicks, 2008. The maturation of global corporate R&D: Evidence from the activity of U.S. foreign subsidiaries//Research Policy, 37 (3). P. 390-406.

36. D. S. Siegel, D. Waldman, A. Link (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study//Research policy. Vol. 32. No. 1. P. 27-48.

37. S. N. Ankrah, T. F. Burgess, P. Grimshaw, N. E. Shaw (2013). Asking both university and industry actors about their engagement in knowledge transfer: What single-group studies of motives omit//Technovation. Vol. 33. No.2. P. 50-65.

38. F. Malerba (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production//Research policy. Vol. 31. No. 2. P. 247-264.

39. R. Cowan, P. A. David, D. Foray (2000). The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness//Industrial and corporate change. Vol. 9. No. 2. P. 211-253.

40. M. Von Zedtwitz, O. Gassmann (2002). Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: four different patterns of managing research and development//Research policy. Vol. 31. No. 4. P. 569-588.

41. J. Howells (1990). The internationalization of R&D and the development of global research networks//Regional Studies. Vol. 24. No. 6. P. 495-512.

42. L. Hakanson, R. Nobel (1993). Research Policy. Vol. 22. Issue 5-6. P. 373-396.

43. M. F. Ramli, A. A. Senin (2015). Success factors to reduce orientation and resources-related barriers in university–industry R&D Collaboration particularly during development research stages//Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 172. P. 375-382.

44. S. Ankrah, O. AL-Tabbaa (2015). Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review//Scandinavian Journal of Management. Vol. 31. No. 3. P. 387-408.

45. A. Panibratov (2015). Liability of foreignness of emerging market firms: The country of origin effect on Russian IT companies//Journal of East-West Business. Vol. 21. No. 1. P. 22-40.

46. F. Cassia, F. Magno (2015). Marketing issues for business-tobusiness firms entering emerging markets: an investigation among Italian companies in Eastern Europe//International Journal of Emerging Markets. Vol. 10. No. 1. P. 141-155.

47. European Commission (2011) Barriers and Drivers in European University Business Cooperation. Brussels: European Commission.

48. O. Gassmann, Z. Han (2004). Motivations and barriers of foreign R&D activities in China//R&D Management. Vol. 34. No. 4. P. 423-437.

49. J. D. Adams, E. P. Chiang, K. Starkey (2001). Industry–university cooperative research centers//The Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 26. No. 1-2. P. 73-86.

50. R. Fontana, A. Geuna, M. Matt (2006). Factors affecting university–industry R&D projects: The importance of searching screening and signaling//Research policy. Vol. 35. No. 2. P. 309-323.

51. S. Chandrasekaran, G. Littlefair, A. Stojcevski (2015). Staff and Students Views on Industry–University Collaboration in Engineering//International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning. Vol. 8. No. 2. P. 21-24.

52. M. Decter, D. Bennett, M. Leseure (2007). University to business technology transferr — UK and USA comparisons//Technovation. Vol. 27. No. 3. P. 145-155.

53. L. Dooley, D. Kirk (2007). University–industry collaboration: Grafting the entrepreneurial paradigm onto academic structures//European Journal of Innovation Management. Vol. 10. No. 3. P. 316-332.

54. K. Debackere, R. Veugelers (2005). The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links//Research policy. Vol. 34. No. 3. P. 321-342.

55. D. B. Audretsch, M. P. Feldman (2004). Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation//Handbook of regional and urban economics. Vol. 4. P. 2713-2739.

56. W. Tsai (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance //Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 44. No. 5. P. 996-1004.

57. W. Hong, Y. S. Su (2013). The effect of institutional proximity in non-local university–industry collaborations: An analysis based on Chinese patent data//Research Policy. Vol. 42. No. 2. P. 454-464.

58. R. Bekkers, I. M. B. Freitas (2008). Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter?//Research policy. Vol. 37. No. 10. P. 1837-1853.

59. G. D. Markman, D. S. Siegel, M. Wright (2008). Research and technology commercialization//Journal of Management Studies. Vol. 45. No. 8. P. 1401-1423.

60. A. Hughes, M. Kitson (2012). Pathways to impact and the strategic role of universities: new evidence on the breadth and depth of university knowledge exchange in the UK and the factors constraining its development Cambridge//Journal of Economics. Vol. 36. No. 3. P. 723-750.

61. P. Phan, D. S. Siegel (2006). The effectiveness of university technology transfer//Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship. Vol. 2. No. 2. P.1-68.

62. F. T. Rothaermel, S. D. Agung, L. Jiang (2007). University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature Industrial and corporate change. Vol.16. No. 4. P. 691-791.

63. R. Kneller, M. Mongeon, J. Cope, C. Garner, P. Ternouth (2014). Industry–University Collaborations in Canada Japan the UK and USA — With Emphasis on Publication Freedom and Managing the Intellectual Property Lock-Up Problem//PloS one. Vol. 9. No. 3 e90302.

64. P. Schubert, N. Bjørn-Andersen (2012). University–Industry collaboration in IS research: An investigation of successful collaboration models//Proceedings of the International Bled Conference. P. 109-126.

65. A. Banal-Estañol, I. Macho-Stadler, D. Pérez-Castrillo (2013). Research output from university–industry collaborative projects//Economic Development Quarterly. Vol. 27. No. 1. P. 71-81.

66. A. Muscio, A. Pozzali (2013). The effects of cognitive distance in university–industry collaborations: some evidence from Italian universities//The Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 38. No. 4. P. 486-508.

67. R. Y. Cavana, B. L. Delahaye, U. Sekaran (2001). Applied business research: Qualitative and quantitative methods. John Wiley & Sons Australia.

68. A. B. Jaffe, M. Trajtenberg, R. Henderson (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations//the Quarterly journal of Economics. P. 577-598.

69. L. Anselin, V. Attila, A. Zoltan (2000). Geographical spillovers and university research: A spatial econometric perspective//Growth and change. Vol. 31. No. 4. P. 501-515.

70. C. Plewa, P. Quester (2007). Key drivers of university–industry relationships: the role of organisational compatibility and personal experience//Journal of Services Marketing. Vol. 21. No. 5. P. 370-382.

Авторы